TWO WOMEN/COVENANTS
Galatians 4:21 Tell
me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the law? 22 For
it is written that Abraham had two sons: the one by a bondwoman, the
other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of
the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and he of the
freewoman through promise, 24 which things are
symbolic. For these are the two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which
gives birth to bondage, which is Hagar— 25 for this
Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and
is in bondage with her children— 26 but
the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all. 27 For
it is written:
28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are children of promise. 29 But, as he who was born according to the flesh then persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, even so it is now. 30 Nevertheless what does the Scripture say? “Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.” 31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman but of the free.
Introduction
All
the promises God made to Abraham have been fulfilled in Him and by Him (2 Cor.
1:20). Indeed, all these same promises that were made to Abraham were also made
to Christ (Gal. 3:16). If we keep in mind that a covenant, at its very basic
level, is a conditional promise, we will see clearly how the law failed. It
failed because no one was able to keep it perfectly. Thus, it brought only condemnation
– until “when the fulness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of
a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we
might receive the adoption as sons” (4:4-5).
Jesus
perfectly kept the law on behalf of those who could not, He received the condemnation
of the law on behalf of those the law condemned, and, by so doing, He redeemed
or bought back everyone who trusts in Him and His redemption. This, of course,
it the very heart of the gospel, the same gospel the Galatians are on the verge
of rejecting.
To
be an adopted son of God that you are no longer a child of the flesh but are
now a child of the promise. A son was promised to Abraham. Isaac was that child
of promise. However, what Isaac typified, Jesus was the antitype. In other
words, the promise that Abraham would have a son was totally fulfilled in Jesus,
who, as to His flesh, is descended from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. We, along
with the believing Galatians, have been adopted as sons of Abraham, not
according to the flesh, but according to the promise.
Paul uses and allegory, a symbol, to teach the Galatians this truth, that believing Gentiles are also Abraham’s children.
Two
Women
Though
her name is not mentioned, the “freewoman” is Sarah, and the “bondwoman” was
Sarah’s servant, Hagar. To be born of Hagar is to be born of a servant or slave.
To be born of a freewoman is to be born free. Though Jesus was born of a woman,
He was also born under the law, which the bondwoman is symbolising. However,
because He perfectly kept every jot and tittle of the law, He demonstrated that
He was in realty born of Sarah not Hagar. In other words, He was THE Child of promise,
the promise God made to Abraham and Sarah (Gen. 15:4, 18:14).
Now,
that this promise was to include both Jews and Gentiles, including those at
Galatia, has already been made clear to Abraham, when God said to him “I will
bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who curses you; and in you
all the families of the earth shall be blessed” (Gen. 12:3). That
blessing, of course, comes in, by, and through Jesus Christ and His gospel. It
does not come through unbelieving Jews or Gentiles.
Some,
in our own day, think that modern day Israel and those who follow the different
forms of modern Jewish religion is what God is referring to with the blessings and
curses in God’s promise to Abraham. However, Paul exposes that false idea by his
allegory about the bondwoman and the freewoman.
| Image from Web |
One
woman equals bondage and one woman equals freedom. Which do you think represents
curses and which do you think represents blessing? The Galatians, under the
influence of the Judaizers, were contemplating placing themselves under the
curse of the law!
Mount
Sinai is where God handed down His law which included all its rules and regulations
for Old Testament Israel, including both the ceremonial law and the judicial
law which have expired now that Christ has come. The ceremonial law was
essentially the gospel in picture form, and the judicial law was how Old
Testament Israel were to conduct themselves as a corporate body. The writer to
the Hebrews contrasts the old covenant with the new, the bondwoman with the
freewoman, i.e., the then with the now:
For you have not come to the
mountain that may be touched and that burned with fire, and to blackness and darkness
and tempest, and the sound of a trumpet and the voice of
words, so that those who heard it begged that the word should
not be spoken to them anymore. (For they could not
endure what was commanded: “And if so much as a beast touches the
mountain, it shall be stoned or shot with an arrow.” And
so terrifying was the sight that Moses said, “I am
exceedingly afraid and trembling.”)
But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, to an innumerable company of angels, to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are registered in heaven, to God the Judge of all, to the spirits of just men made perfect, to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel. (Heb. 12:18-24)
| All engrafted into one olive tree (Image from Web) |
Yes, we are all one in Christ. The Judaizers where teaching the Galatians that they needed to become Jews to get right with God, but Paul was teaching that both Jew and Gentile get right with God through faith in Christ Jesus. Only those who belong to Christ are children of Abraham, children of the promise, i.e., children of the freewoman.
Two
Covenants
Which
two covenants is Paul talking about when he says, “For these are the two
covenants…”? He is not talking about the pre-Fall covenant God made with Adam.
Nor is he talking about the Noahic covenant. Clearly, the covenant of bondage
is the Mosaic covenant.
It
is not hard to see that the Mosaic covenant somewhat echoes the Adamic covenant
and the Noahic covenant. The pre-Fall Adam was promised life for obedience and
death for disobeying God. Yes, blessings and curses. Same for Israel after
Sinai (Deut. 28). Noah knew the difference between clean and unclean animals (Gen.
7:2, 8:20), which would be incorporated into the ceremonial law as part of the
sacrificial system. Of course, the sacrifice of these “clean” animals was
foreshadowed in the covenant God cut with Abraham (Gen. 15).
| Image from Web |
If
we keep in mind that the ceremonial law was essentially picturing what the
promised Messiah was coming to do, i.e., the seed promised to Abraham, we won’t
confuse the Mosaic and Abrahamic covenants. Though both are administrations of
the covenant of grace, the Mosaic covenant emphasised works of obedience while
the Abrahamic covenant emphasised faith. The idea of the Mosaic covenant was
not given as a means for Israel to earn salvation. It was given to teach Israel
about the promised Messiah, the One who would bring salvation, the One who was
promised to Abraham.
Confused?
Well, so were the Galatians and so are many Christians today. Why? Because of
false teachers. Salvation was never by faith plus works, even works of the law.
It was always by faith alone, but a faith that was never alone. As James says, “But
someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith
without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works” (James
2:18). Good works are a fruit of faith, i.e., a fruit of the Spirit who gives
the gift of faith. The Galatians along with some Christians today were thinking
that it is works that produce faith and not the other way around. It’s
covenantal.
The
Mosaic law and the history of Old Testament Israel under that covenant
demonstrated time and time again that no one could keep the law. It was given
to show our need of someone who could keep that law on our behalf. Thus, the
promise of the Messiah! That is why Jesus was “born of a woman, born under the
law.” He needed to be like us in every way apart from our sin which condemns
and disqualifies us. The Mosaic covenant is about how we are adopted as children of
Abraham.
Mosaic
covenant is about the flesh epitomised in fleshly circumcision. The Abrahamic
covenant is about believing the promise depicted by fleshly circumcision,
“Therefore circumcise the foreskin of your heart, and be stiff-necked no
longer” (Deut. 10:16). How does one circumcise the foreskin of one’s heart? Do
like Abraham the father of the faithful, “And he believed in the LORD, and He
accounted it to him for righteousness” (Gen. 15:6; Rom. 4:3). “How then was it
accounted? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised,
but while uncircumcised. And he received the sign
of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had
while still uncircumcised, that he might be the father of all
those who believe, though they are uncircumcised, that righteousness might be
imputed to them also” (Rom. 4:10-11). The “foolish” Galatians were giving up
salvation by faith alone for a faith plus works, a works righteousness.
Abraham
did what Jesus commands us to do where He says, “Repent and believe in the
gospel” (Mark 1:15). Wait! say some. There was no gospel in the Old Testament! Weren’t
they saved by keeping the law? That’s what the Judaizers were erroneously
teaching. However, Scripture begs to differ where it says, “And the
Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached
the gospel to Abraham beforehand, saying, “In you all the
nations shall be blessed.” So then those who are of
faith are blessed with believing Abraham” (Gal. 3:8-9).
| Image from eb |
Hagar
conceived and bore Ishmael. Subsequently, Sarah conceived and bore Isaac.
Ishamel. In the process of time, “Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian,
whom she had borne to Abraham, scoffing. Hagar and her son were ejected
from the camp. Therefore she said to Abraham, “Cast
out this bondwoman and her son; for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir
with my son, namely with Isaac” (Gen. 21:9-10). This is what
Paul is referring to where he says, “But, as he who was born according to
the flesh then persecuted him who was born according to the
Spirit, even so it is now” (4:29). The Judaizers are
persecuting the Galatians who have been born according to the Spirit!
Because of the weakness of the flesh, the Mosaic covenant brought only bondage. Because of the power of the Spirit, the new covenant foreshadowed in the Abrahamic, brings freedom. Freedom from what? From bondage, from being a slave to the flesh and the works of the flesh. God doesn’t need a hand to save you. Therefore, “Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.” And remember, “So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman but of the free.”
Conclusion
The old covenant was administered and kept by shedding the shedding of lots of blood, of bulls, goats, lambs etc., and even human blood through circumcision, external ceremonies all representing what the promised Messiah was coming to do. The Old Testament saints were saved through believing these promises. Jesus perfectly kept every jot and tittle of the requirements of the law. The new covenant is administered and kept through unbloody sacraments representing the shed blood of Christ and the faithful proclamation of the gospel, the good news of what Jesus has done and our belief in His righteousness revealed therein.
Christ is the key to understanding Paul’s allegory of the two covenants. Hagar and her son were excommunicated. They were sent away. They were of the flesh, additions to the gospel. Sarah’s son was a child of the Spirit, a child of God’s promise. Jesus is the true Son, the One from whom all of God’s promised blessings to Abraham flow. Therefore, we must be done with all our feeble attempts to improve on the gospel and thereby be guilty of trusting in the flesh and not the Spirit. Trust only in Jesus!