Tuesday, November 5, 2024

CHRISTMAS

 

Christmas

Image from Web
Christmas is about the incarnation. We sing about it every year in the old Wesley hymn, Hark! The Herald Angels Sing! ‘Veiled in flesh the Godhead see/ Hail, the incarnate Deity/ Pleased as Man with man to dwell/ Jesus, our Immanuel.’ Yet, I fear that, along with the Trinity, the two natures of Christ is perhaps one of the most misunderstood teachings of the Bible. It wasn’t the Father or the Spirit who became flesh, but God the Son. Christmas celebrates this fact. Therefore, those who deny that God is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit also deny that Jesus is the incarnate Deity. However, those in whose hearts the Spirit has effectively worked savingly with His Word, those whom God by His grace alone has regenerated and declared righteous on Christ’s account, see clearly according to Scripture alone that Jesus is the second Person in the Godhead who was born as a human baby in Bethlehem. God and Man in one Divine Person with two distinct natures forever.

The Incarnation of God did not begin on the very first Christmas Day, but rather some nine months prior in the womb of a woman who was virgin at the time. Mary, the virgin, was having the same problem we would be having when she heard that she was going to conceive without a man. However, God had it explained to her: ‘And the angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you; therefore, also, that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God”’ (Luke 1:35). And Mary had the benefit of knowing and also applying the Old Testament Scriptures: ‘Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel’ (Isa. 7:14). Immanuel, of course, means ‘God with us’ (Matt. 1:23). So, the third Person of the Godhead, in Mary’s womb united her human substance with the Divine substance of God as she conceived the Son that she gave birth to on that first Christmas Day.

Now, this is where it begins to go wrong for some people. They think that if Jesus is God, then as God He didn’t need to be born in the usual way, opening the womb (Luke 2:22-24). Couldn’t He just ooze through the walls of Mary’s womb? You see the same happening with His resurrection. They think that He oozed out of His graveclothes and oozed through the tomb walls even before the stone was rolled away, that He oozed through the locked door into the room where His disciples were meeting after His resurrection. But this is to confuse His two natures, the human with the Divine! It is a popular belief today. Jesus is fully God! And we don’t like your use of the word ‘ooze’! Yes, but He’s also fully Man and I don’t like the way you’ve got Him passing through solid objects as if His body were not like yours and mine!

Isn’t Christmas more exciting when as adults we can talk about adult stuff, such as ‘What did Jesus get you?’ instead of childish things, e.g., ‘What did Santa get you?’ By His Incarnation Jesus has ensured, in the words of the old song, ‘Man will live forevermore/ Because of Christmas day.’ (Belafonte) How so? ‘For this reason He had to be made like them, fully human in every way, in order that He might become a merciful and faithful High Priest in service to God, and that He might make atonement for the sins of the people’ (Heb. 2:17). The Son saved humans by becoming fully human and remaining fully human forever. He’ll live on the new Earth with those humans He has saved (Matt. 5:5) by His incarnation (John 1:14), life, death, resurrection (Matt. 1:21), ascension (Dan. 7:14) and bodily return (Acts 1:11). 

Click the link for Celtic Worship playing their version of Hark! The Herlad Angels Sing! https://youtu.be/LN0FRBdNC1E?si=Bhv0sJkZ6-hOlzf6

Monday, November 4, 2024

PRAYING FOR A MIRACLE

 

Little Johnny raised his hand and said to his teacher, “Miss, can I go to the toilet?”  Ever true to her vocation, Johnny’s teacher took every opportunity to teach. “You mean, may I go to the bathroom.” Little Johnny replied with a question, “Well, can I?” Discerning the urgency of the present situation, the teacher granted Johnny’s request, “Yes, you may.”

Hezekiah's Prayer for Healing
(Image from the Net)
Whereas the word can speaks of ability, may speaks of an optional possibility or probability. God can do miraculous things. When it comes to God and our diseases it’s not can I be healed, but rather, heavenly Father, may I be healed? God can heal us, but He may or He may not. For those of us who are still alive, we have perhaps seen or experienced the two ways God heals us: a) the rare miraculous, and b) the common use of secondary means – such as medical technology, surgical precision, and modern medicine as administered by doctors etc. As Christians we certainly give God the glory for those rare miraculous healings, however, when it comes to the latter, perhaps we’re not always so enthusiastic about glorifying God when He instead chooses to use instruments. Thus, we glorify God for apparent ‘supernatural’ healing, but not so much for ‘natural’ healing, yet both are from Him. He can use the extraordinary or He may use the ordinary or He may not use either.      

James Montgomery Boice had liver cancer. His congregation and friends told him they were praying to God for his healing. As a teacher and preacher true to his calling, he responded by saying to his congregation,

“A relevant question, I guess, is when you pray, pray for what? Should you pray for a miracle? Well, you’re free to do that, of course. My general impression is that the God who is able to do miracles, and He certainly can, is also able to keep you from getting the problem in the first place. So, although miracles do happen, they’re rare. A miracle, by definition, has to be an unusual thing. I think it’s far more profitable to pray for wisdom for the doctors. Doctors have a great deal of experience, of course, in their expertise, but they are not omniscient. They do make mistakes. And then also, for the effectiveness of the treatment. Sometimes it does very well, and sometimes not so well, and that is certainly a legitimate thing to pray for. Above all, I would say, pray for the glory of God. If you think of God glorifying Himself in history, and you say, where in all of history has God most glorified Himself? He did it at the cross of Jesus Christ. And it wasn’t by delivering Jesus from the cross, though He could have. Jesus said, “Don’t you think I could call down from My Father ten legions of angels for My defence?” But He didn’t do that. And yet that’s where God is most glorified.”[1]

James Montgomery Boice died on the 15th of June 2000 at the age of 61 from liver cancer. He was a man of prayer, a most humble man of prayer. I saw him at a conference on Mount Tamborine, Queensland in the 90s. His voice reminded me of the famous actor, Richard Widmark, who played Jim Bowie in the 1960 movie The Alamo, along with John Wayne as Davy Crocket. (We can make idols out of great actors, and we sometimes do. As Christians, we sometimes may be guilty of doing something similar with great preachers and teachers of the faith!) Dr Boice had just finished delivering a great talk, after which we were having a break. I wanted to do some backslapping and tell him how brilliant his lecture was. The place was abuzz, and I couldn’t find him anywhere in the crowd. I noticed that a side door was slightly ajar. I squinted through the opening. There was the solitary figure of Dr Boice, standing with head bowed and eyes closed, with his back against the wall as if trying to hide. He was deep in prayer with his Lord. I returned to the crowd with that image of that saint burnt forever into my retina, yes, my heart. Even when no one could see him, he was teaching us about Jesus! Jesus often retreated from the great crowd to pray (Luke 5:16) and taught His disciples to do likewise (Mark 3:7; Luke 9:10).

As the cross began to cast its shadow of death upon Jesus, our great Teacher and Preacher, we observe the following,Then Jesus went with his disciples to a place called Gethsemane, and he said to them, “Sit here while I go over there and pray.” He took Peter and the two sons of Zebedee along with him, and he began to be sorrowful and troubled. Then he said to them, “My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death. Stay here and keep watch with me.” Going a little farther, he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, “My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will.” Then he returned to his disciples and found them sleeping. “Couldn’t you men keep watch with me for one hour?” he asked Peter. “Watch and pray so that you will not fall into temptation. The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.” He went away a second time and prayed, “My Father, if it is not possible for this cup to be taken away unless I drink it, may your will be done.” (Matt. 26:36-42 NIV).

There’s the old story about the guy on the roof of his house in a flood with the water rising, refusing help from a boat and then a chopper saying he was praying that God would save him. He was praying for a miracle, but God had already sent him the means for him to be saved from the deluge. He couldn’t see it because he was waiting for the miraculous.

God wants us to pray to Him. He can do the miraculous, but more often than not heals us by ordinary means. Remember that Paul recommended to Timothy that he use a little wine to heal his stomach ailment and frequent illnesses (1 Tim. 5:23). We are given a little peak behind the scenes where Hezekiah humbly prays to God with tears because he is going to die. Then the Lord told Isaiah to tell Hezekiah, “I have heard your prayer and seen your tears; I will add fifteen years to your life” (Isa. 38:5). However, though God can, He didn’t use the extraordinary to heal Hezekiah, but the ordinary, “Isaiah had said, “Prepare a poultice of figs and apply it to the boil, and he will recover” (Isa. 38:21; 2 Kings 20:1-7).

Therefore, when we are praying for a miracle, we must not forget that God, though He can do the miraculous, He may and is more likely to use the ordinary. His is the glory! And we must also be prepared for the worst, as was James Montgomery Boice, yes, as was Jesus. In the words of Job “Though he slay me, yet will I hope in him” (Job 13:15a).  



[1] Remembering James Montgomery Boice, (See at 2.10 in https://youtu.be/AOiio8N4WrA

Saturday, October 12, 2024

NOT HOME YET (Review)

"Not Home Yet: How the Renewal of the Earth Fits into God's Plan for the World" - An easy to read, sane, sensible, and terse distillation of a much-neglected teaching of the Bible of which far too many Christians are ignorant - heaven and earth.

This is Biblical Theology at its best, beginning "In the beginning" with Genesis 1 and in the Garden with God's covenant with Adam and the Cultural Mandate, and ending in Revelation 21-22 with God's covenant with the last Adam in the Garden-City with the Great Commission/Cultural Mandate fulfilled in Christ.

Creation and recreation are solidly grounded in the basic Christian belief of "the resurrection of the body" (see Apostles' Creed). Our bodies don't burn up, but our same bodies are renewed, likewise, neither does creation burn up but this same creation is renewed.
Quite a brilliant book that speaks volumes in an economy of words!

Monday, October 7, 2024

AN OPTIMISTIC ESCHATLOGY

 Excerpted from pgs. 413-17. If not in Australia, check Amazon for copy in your own country  

The Kingdom: Every Square Inch : McKinlay, Neil Cullan, Schwartz, D. Rudi: Amazon.com.au: Books

An optimistic eschatology

Neither the negativity of Two Kingdom Theology nor Dispensationalism nor anything else will stop Christ’s Kingdom from coming. Why? Because His Kingdom, (yes, yet another little trinity!), has come (past tense), is coming (present tense), and will come (future tense). Imperceptible to the naked eye, it progressively expands like the tiny mustard seed that grows into a great tree, and in influence like the yeast in the batch of dough. We cannot stop it because it is not we, but the Spirit of Christ, that is building His Kingdom. Our hastening or our hindering its coming is simply another way of saying that God blesses covenant obedience and curses covenant disobedience. Therefore, it is important that we properly understand the Great Commission as we pray the Lord’s Prayer lest we disobey and disappoint the King.

It is presumed that the reader has a basic understanding of the three main views of ‘end times’, viz., Premillennialism, Amillennialism, and Postmillennialism. There are books aplenty discussing each member of this trinity. Now, when discussing each of these views, it can be difficult for the reviewer to give an assessment unbiased by his own particular perspective. That being said, in terms of Scottish weather, in order of sequence (i.e.., Pre-, A-, Post-) one might describe a) as overcast and raining, b) clouds with intermittent showers, and c) clear skies and sunny. For the first two, one needs to take an umbrella. For the last, sunscreen and sunglasses will do.

While referring to themselves as Optimillennials, those of the Postmillennial view refer to those holding the other two views as Pessimillennials. Should Christians be optimistic or pessimistic about God’s Kingdom promise to Jesus (and to us in Christ)? “But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ’s at His coming. Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power. For He must reign till He has put all enemies under His feet. The last enemy that will be destroyed is death” (1 Cor. 15:23-26). So, we see that it is God who is progressively subduing all of Christ's enemies (and ours). Just as Jesus defeated death by being resurrected from the dead, so will all those that belong to Him at the Last Day, a.k.a. Resurrection Day or Judgment Day.

Though there are trinities within this trinity of views, e.g., Premillennialism’s Pre, Mid, and Post-tribulation, all three views are agreed that Christ’s Kingdom is coming. The Pre- and A- views believe that things will not get better on earth till after Christ’s bodily return. The Premillennialist believes that things will progressively get worse, the Amillennialist believes that things will pretty much continue as they are. The former studies the news for signs of what it believes are supposed to take place before Christ’s return, with a particular fixation on today’s Israel and Jews in general. Some of the latter style themselves as optimistic Amillennialists, which, to all intents and purposes makes them Postmillennial, though they may not like to admit it. Postmillennialism is viewed by the other two as being triumphalist. However, as we have already noted, it is not we by our feeble human efforts, but God by His Spirit who progressively brings in Christ’s Kingdom. As it was for Zerubbabel, so it is for us, “This is the word of the LORD to Zerubbabel: ‘Not by might nor by power, but by My Spirit’” (Zech. 4:6).

Albert Wolters puts paid to an old canard, the false notion that having an optimist eschatology means anything other than a forward march fraught with falling into, but then draining and filling in swamps, ditches, and potholes. It is no smooth triumphalism. Says Wolters,

[T]he coming of Christ introduced an overlap of the ages in which the powers of evil continue to co-exist with the healing and renewing power of the age to come (Matt. 13:24-30, 36-43). A battle between these two “powers” characterizes this time period. In fact we live in a time when the antithesis between the two kingdoms has been heightened.

The history of this “time between the times,” then, will not be one of smooth progress or an incremental linear development of the kingdom towards its consummation. Neither will our mission be one that resembles a steady victorious march toward the end. Rather this redemptive era is one of fierce conflict with many casualties. Our mission will be one that is costly and will involve suffering. Paul states that “everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted” (2 Tim. 3:12, NIV; cf. Acts 14:22). How close our understanding of mission is to the New Testament’s may perhaps be in part judged by the place which we accord to suffering in our understanding of the calling of the church.

Now, Two Kingdom Theology belongs in the Amillennial camp, and, like Premillennialism, it does not hold to the progressive Christianisation of nations (and all the sovereign spheres therein) as Christ’s Kingdom continues to grow larger and spread in influence till Christ comes again, i.e., till His Kingdom comes. And so, if the Postmillennial view is triumphalist, then surely the Premillennial and Amillennial views are defeatist.

Like the man who “drew a bow at a venture, and smote the king of Israel between the joints of the harness”, so Premills and Amills think they have found the chink in the Postmill’s armour. It is found among those verses of Revelation from whence those endless disputes about Millennialism come. One is where it speaks of Satan being bound for a thousand years (a millennium). “And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season” (Rev. 20:3 KJV). It is upon that little word “till” (ἄχρι) in the verse just quoted that the doctrine of “final apostasy” or “Satan’s little season” has been built. How can the Postmill position of the progressively increasing Kingdom – even to such a point where the nations will have beat their war weapons into gardening and agricultural implements and study war no more – be true if, in the end, Satan is going to be released to deceive the nations? According to the Postmill view, aren’t all the nations supposed to be Christian nations by then? Nigel Lee responds,

The KJV misunderstands the meaning of the word achri [ἄχρι] and renders Rev. 20:2-3:The Devil…should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled” etc., missuggesting that after the ‘Millennium’ the Devil will again deceive the Nations afresh. This is not so. For, after the visible return of Christ for His saved Nations at the end of the ‘Millennium’ – all the then-unchained Devil will be enabled to do – is keep on deceiving the resurrected dead nations he had previously been deceiving until the start of the ‘Millennium’ some thousand years earlier. Accordingly, we have better rendered Rev. 20:2-3; “The Devil…should deceive the Nations not even when the thousand years were completedetc.[1]      

In an article titled Reconstructing Postmillennialism, Martin Selbrede referred to Postmills who struggled with texts of the supposed ‘final apostasy’ as ‘pessimistic Postmillennialists’. Says Selbrede,

Modern postmils took Boettner’s 1958 ideas and ran with them, while Boettner’s continued scriptural examination of the issue led him to revise his book in 1984, readopting Warfield’s view and rejecting the final apostasy. Somebody surely missed the boat. But who? Today’s optimillennialists? Or Dr. Boettner?[2]

In Nigel Lee’s John’s Revelation Unveiled, (from which we have just quoted above), we find a Commendation by Professor Dr. Loraine Boettner, (which he wrote to Dr Lee in 1978), in which we read,

…I think that you have given a good explanation of that very difficult passage, Rev. 20:7-10. That is a section of Scripture that has been puzzling to me, as on the surface it seems to indicate a future final apostasy of the Church; and yet that seemed so contrary to what I believed would actually take place – no apostasy but rather a smooth transfer or merger into the heavenly kingdom…

Dr. Warfield did not believe that there would be a final apostasy. You have given a good explanation – that there is no actual apostasy, no real danger ever faces the saints, and that the Devil and his followers, are merely exposed before the righteous shortly before their final expulsion into hell. Thank you for it.

Directly after quoting Dr Warfield, says Dr Boettner in his revised 1984 version of The Millennium,

We agree that Revelation 20:1-10 affords no real basis for believing that there is to be a final apostasy in the sense that a large proportion of earth’s inhabitants turn against God, or that the safety of the saints is seriously threatened.[3]

Nigel Lee again,

There is no question of Satan deceiving the Christian majority of all the World’s many inhabitants – in that day! Nor is there then any apostasy from the World-dominating latter-day Church. Thus: Hippolytus, Jonathan Edwards, John Gill, Moses Stuart, Warfield, Stonehouse, Kik, Boettner, Vonk, Rissi, and Rushdoony. Nor is there even a short period of successful renewed Satanic activity to deceive even a portion of any Nation then extant. No! At that time, powerless Satan will need to be enabled, however feebly, to crawl out of his prison. Only Almighty God can and will unlock the door – and then turf out the Devil, unto his Final Judgment.

Still, the Devil will then indeed make a feeble and desperate attempt “to deceive” his previous dupes once more. Yet in doing this, he thus deceives not God’s elect – but only Satan’s own servants.[4]

And so whatever the real or imagined chink in the Postmill’s armour was, it has now been expertly repaired and our optimistic eschatology is fully intact.

Christ has already defeated death, and even though we are still in the ‘not yet’ aspect, we have confidence because of His resurrection as firstfruits. And because Christ has already ascended to receive His Kingdom, though we are still in the ‘not yet’, it is as good as having arrived! And though we have only received tokens of the ‘not yet’ (such as the Holy Spirit, regeneration, salvation, new hearts, new natures, new records et al), we are as good as having been resurrected as we await the redemption of our bodies.

So, after that brief but necessary digression in which we have stated, using the broadest of terms, some of the stumbling blocks and aversions some Christians have towards cultural engagement. It has to do with your view in eschatology, your view of last things from the perspective of your own day. Premillennialism says, why bother engaging culture when Christ is coming back at any moment? And Two Kingdom Theology Amillennialism says, engaging culture it is not the Church’s remit. But here’s what Henry Van Til says,

Through sin man fell away from God and his religion became apostate, but through Christ man is restored to true religion. It is therefore more correct to ask what the role of culture is in religion than to put the question the other way around … Man, in the deepest reaches of his being, is religious; he is determined by his relationship to God ... Hutchison … says, “For religion is not one aspect or department of life besides the others, as modern secular thought likes to believe; it consists rather in the orientation of all human life to the absolute.” Tillich has captured the idea in a trenchant line, “Religion is the substance of culture and culture is the form of religion.”[5]



[1] Francis Nigel Lee, John’s Revelation Unveiled, (Lygstryders, Lynnwoodrif, South Africa, 1999), 273, fn. 911.

[2] Martin G. Selbrede, 160 Journal of Christian Reconstruction / vol. 15.01, in an article titled Reconstructing Postmillennialism, 159-60.

[3] Loraine Boettner, The Millennium, (The Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1957, Revised edition 1984), 74.

[4] Francis Nigel Lee, Ibid, 278.

[5] Henry Van Til, The Calvinistic Concept of Culture, (Baker Book House Company, Grand Rapids, 1959, Re[5]print 2001), 37.

Saturday, October 5, 2024

HORSES

                                                                            Horses

Image from Net
Horses play large in our vocabulary: Horseplay, horsepower, horse sense, flogging a dead horse, don’t look a gift horse in the mouth, wild horses wouldn’t drag me away, get off your high horse, hold your horses, etc. It seems that we are always talking about horses. One of my hobby horses is the Bible and talking about the King of kings, which for me means that politics and religion go together like a horse and carriage. Yet, today’s society tries hard to unhitch the horse (Christianity) from its carriage (politics). It teaches that talking about these things is verboten. Thankfully, I don’t live in that world. For me it’s horses for courses. 

Politics has to do with governance, whole nations and every aspect thereof. Government is God’s minister to promote good and discourage evil (Rom. 13:1-5). Therefore, they are accountable to Christ, the King of kings for implementing His instruction (Matt. 25:32; Acts 17:31; Phil. 2:9-11). ‘Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people’ (Prov. 14:34). Speaking of horses…

Everyone has heard of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (Rev. 6:2-8). Each rides a differently coloured horse – white, fiery red, black, and pale, each horse and rider symbolising something. Though the Book of Revelation is seen by sensationalists as the motherload to mine for material for their bestselling books, they invariable are putting the cart before the horse. They interpret Revelation from the daily news rather than the rest of Scripture (See, e.g., Zech. 1:8-17; 6:1-8).

Revelation is all about the construction of Christ’s Kingdom while at the same time Satan’s kingdom is gradually being destroyed. In other words, it’s all about Jesus, the King of kings, progressively conquering the nations by His Spirit and His Word, i.e., with His Law and Gospel working in the hearts of men, women, and children. ‘And I looked, and behold, a white horse. And he who sat on it had a bow; and a crown was given to him, and he went out conquering and to conquer’ (Rev. 6:2). This rider has been identified as everything from Christ to His opposite, viz., antichrist. Scary videos are legion promoting their aberrations. We’ll let the sane and sober Bible commentator Matthew Henry give us a brief description of this verse: ‘The Lord Jesus appears riding on a white horse … The successful progress of the gospel of Christ in the world is a glorious sight, worth beholding. Christ’s work is not done all at once.’ Christians know how difficult it can be at times sharing the gospel with friends. You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink. However, lest we be discouraged we must remember that the Spirit must work with the Word, the sword of the Spirit, otherwise they will not drink the water of life. The Rider of the white horse must slay them before they will live.    

'Now I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse. And He who sat on him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and makes war. His eyes were like a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns. He had a name written that no one knew except Himself. He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God. And the armies in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, followed Him on white horses. Now out of His mouth goes a sharp sword, that with it He should strike the nations. And He Himself will rule them with a rod of iron. He Himself treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And He has on His robe and on His thigh a name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS’ (Rev. 19:11-16).


Monday, September 23, 2024

A NEW CHAPTER

From Mason to Minister - Nordskog Publishing

A New Chapter (pgs. 70-73)

After completing the three degrees of the Blue Lodge, I came to a fork in the road. Should I now seek admission into Scottish Rite or York Rite Freemasonry? I had read enough of the book The Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry (1871) by the American Albert Pike (1809-1892) to put me off taking the Scottish Rite route! Albert Pike is very much maligned by - and apparently very much misunderstood by – anti-Masons. I personally found the contents and language of his Morals and Dogma book to be very esoteric. I believe this in itself is an unchristian approach to writing, for Christianity is all about truth done in the light - nothing is purposely hidden. Thus the word “occultish” sums up Pike’s book for me.

It was through reading Morals and Dogma that I was led to believe that there had to be an elite and occultist group - a wheel within the wheels of Masonry if you will - in which and among which the hidden secrets of God and His universe resided. For Pike unabashedly alleges that the Master Mason, after having gone through the first three degrees, has been duped. Wrote Pike:

The Blue Degrees are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are displayed there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them, but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them.”

(Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, prepared for the Supreme Council of the Thirty-Third Degree for the Southern Jurisdiction of the U.S., Charleston, 1871, 819).

In other words, Pike was urging the Master Mason to proceed through the Scottish Rite degrees in order to learn and discern the true nature of Masonry.

At the time, what Pike had written seemed very ominous to me, especially in light of what Scripture has to say about occult practices! Indeed on Pike’s instigation I started reading writings on the Jewish cabala. Thankfully, however, instead of going through the Scottish Rite, I sought and gained entrance into the “more Christian,” as I was told, York Rite.

This being said about Albert Pike and his Morals and Dogma, and whatever terrible things his enemies may have said about him, Pike is reported to have been a staunch Trinitarian Christian till his dying day. I’ll let the reader make up his or her own mind on this! There is much information about him to be found on the Internet that has been written by Freemasons themselves. The Scottish Rite, from what I could see, had very little if anything to do with Scotland-hence, for me, the obvious “Scottish” attraction was assuaged. The Holy Royal Arch, or York Rite Freemasonry, is a branch of what is sometimes referred to as Red Lodge. The Holy Royal Arch is more commonly known as “Chapter.” Royal Arch, or Chapter, is a continuation (even the completion) of the three Blue Lodge degrees, as has been well said: “Pure Ancient Freemasonry consists of but three degrees, that of Entered Apprentice, Fellowcraft, and Master Mason, including the Supreme Order of the Holy Royal Arch.”[1] A cursory search of the Internet revealed the following handy, concise, and verifiable information regarding Chapter:

The Chapter of Royal Arch Masonry itself consists of four degrees: Mark Master; Past Master; Most Excellent Master, and Royal Arch Mason. The Royal Arch Degree being said to be the climax of Ancient Craft Masonry and Masonic Symbolism. It is described as “the root and marrow of Freemasonry.” It is the complete story of Jewish History during some of its darkest hours. Jerusalem and the Holy Temple are destroyed, the people are being held captive as slaves in Babylon. Here you will join with some slaves as they are set free to return home and engage in the noble and glorious work of rebuilding the city and the Temple of God. It is during this rebuilding that they make a discovery that brings to light the greatest treasure of a Mason - the long lost Master’s Word. Many historians have traced the earliest origins of the Royal Arch Degree to Ireland, late in the 17th century and in England in 1738. In 1752, ambulatory or military warrants for Lodges were introduced. This was instrumental in placing the Royal Arch Degree on a par with the Master Mason Degree. Military lodges were greatly responsible for planting Freemasonry in the Colonies and also gave birth to the use of the Marl and Royal Arch degrees in the “New World.” Lodge records show that the Royal Arch Degree was conferred at Fredericksburg No. 4 on December 12, 1753. George Washington was raised [i.e., symbolically resurrected to become a Master Mason] in this lodge a few months prior to this date. The value of Royal Arch Masonry will be appreciated by all who are exalted to that most sublime degree, particularly by those who are seeking to complete their Masonic education. It reveals the full light of Ancient Craft Masonry, presents it as a complete system in accordance with the original plan and justly entitles you to claim the noble name of Master Mason.”[2]

I don’t suppose either the United States of America’s first president and Church of England Episcopalian George Washington (1732-1799) or Canada’s first Prime Minister, Sir John A. MacDonald (1819-1891), entered Freemasonry for the same reason I did. I was seeking God. I thought that Christians were like sheep - and I didn’t want to be a sheep! That’s why I didn’t attend church to look for God! The truth is that I had been put off of Christianity by the Pentecostal televangelist “preachers” who inundated Canadian television at the time. I was afraid of their Christianity. There were numerous televangelist scandals in the late 1980s, so, understandably, I thought “the church” was only after people’s minds and money. But a new chapter began in my life when I joined the Chapter of Royal Arch Masonry. It was there that I was confronted by “the stone the builders rejected.”



[1] Articles of Union, Mother Grand Lodge (England), 1831.

[2] (www.themasonict rowel.com/Articles/apendent_bodies/york/further_light_masonry_royal_arch_ mason.htm) 

Tuesday, September 17, 2024

NEITHER HERE NOR THERE (Review)

 

Neither Here nor There (Review)

Having grown up in the beautiful Vale of the Leven in the 60s and having worked there in the 70s, this book was of special interest to me. My father worked as a boilermaker/plater in Dennys’s shipyard, Dumbarton around the same time as one of my brothers once worked for the Lennox Herald as a reporter/sub-editor. My mother was from ‘old’ Bonhill.

The book’s title is self-explanatory of its contents: Neither Here nor There - Migration: Irish and Scots in Dumbarton and the Vale of Leven 1855-1900 by CG Docherty. As one would expect, the book contains lots of numbers and statistics about the influx of migrants to the area, data regarding their housing and housing situations, (ten a room tenements etc.) and commentary on their places of employment, wages and working conditions. Sources include census records from those times.

The fast-flowing River Leven running through the Vale of Leven from Loch Lomond to the River Clyde lent itself well to the textile and shipbuilding industries that were the big attractions for migrants to the area during the years the book deals with – mostly women to the Vale and men to Dumbarton (see e.g., pgs. 169-70). As an oversimplification, it was the cloth of the Vale with its related bleaching, dyeing, printing, weaving, etc. versus the heavy metal industry with its related red-hot forges and furnaces, riveting, pealing hammers, etc. of Dumbarton.

Though the stats can sometimes be a challenge for those who don’t “do” numbers, the author, methodically but eloquently, delightfully adds to the pot pinches of poetic prose, as he intelligently interacts with the voluminous facts and findings. (This book is no slapped together makeshift raft built by weans for sailing doon the Leven on. With intentions of making it to Dumbarton, a mate and I did this onetime and managed to float down the Leven from Balloch to just beyond the ‘Stuckie’ Bridge before overhanging branches capsised our jerry-built raft! Anyway, how were we supposed to get back to the Vale from Dumbarton in only our swimming trunks?!) The book’s garnered information is professionally end noted with tidy references from whence it was sourced and is neatly set at the end of each chapter. There are some old b/w photos and maps, a helpful index and a Bibliography.

Why Vale folk are referred to as ‘jeely eaters’ is explained:


Whether using natural or artificial products, the dyeing process produced harmful liquids and unpleasant, often noxious, vapours. Those who worked in this industry faced hazardous conditions daily – often with serious consequences. Female print workers were known as ‘jeely eaters’ because their hands were stained permanently red. p. 27.  

One of the ‘Sons of the Rock’ went down with the Titanic:
              

Roderick Chisholm, born in Dumbarton 1868 … was one of nine men selected for the ‘Guarantee Team’ that would sail on the Titanic’s maiden voyage, none of whom survived its sinking.” pgs. 119-20.

Referring to an article in the Lennox, we see something of the discouraging disparagements Irish migrants had to contend with:


[I]n 1864, the Lennox Herald reported that Irish illiteracy was the reason why houses had to be given numbers in Renton, the village with the heaviest concentration of Irish in the Vale of Leven. p. 141.

Though I was witness to sectarianism in the 70s, it was mostly in the form of friendly banter regarding the ‘Auld Firm’, i.e., Glasgow Rangers and Glasgow Celtic, (with Celtic FC, of course, being equated with the Irish Catholics and Rangers FC with the Scots Protestants). Docherty alerts us that a version of ‘fake news’ was also around way back then. For he goes on to write:


In towns with identifiable ‘Irish areas’, reportage in local newspapers ensured that there was much attention paid to disputes between the Irish and the Scots and amongst the Irish themselves. Whereas evidence of cooperation, particularly amongst industrial labourers who worked and lived beside each other, was not newsworthy. The Scots and Irish were not in constant conflict with each other, even if some newspapers gave the impression otherwise. pgs. 146-47.

Yet, perhaps paradoxically, the author goes on to inform the reader, “There were employers who expressly refused to hire Irish Catholics, a situation that persisted well into the twentieth century.” p. 175. Like the ‘common old working chap’ in the ‘I Belong to Glasgow’ song, perhaps the perspective on sectarianism in the Vale and Dumbarton changed with ‘a couple of drinks on a Saturday’!

The River Leven will be happy now that the bleach and dyes of the textile and print factories no longer mix together with effluence in the eddies of its waters. Though in our own day the closing of the textile and shipbuilding industries along the stagnant backwaters of her banks have left pockets of depression in the Vale and Dumbarton, however, much of the effluence has been transformed into affluence. Having become part of the Scottish diaspora in the mid-Seventies, I am always impressed on return visits when I see how far we have come.

The stats, facts, and figures so capably verbalised in Neither Here nor There for the years of 1855-1900 is, of course, now all water under the bridge. However, it gives us an informed and detailed sense of who we are and where we have come from. This book has done the Vale and Dumbarton a great service and ought to be on the bookshelf of every home there. We may be neither here nor there but we’ve come a long way. Thank you CG Docherty for writing this part of our history so readably.