MY OWN HAND
“See with what
large letters I have written to you with my own hand!” (Gal. 4:11)
Introduction
There has been a lot written about this one verse, much of it is pure speculation! I had a look at various commentators to see what they had to say about this verse. It wasn’t long before I noticed that there was a fair bit of disagreement. Therefore, I was tempted just to skip over this verse and move on to the next. But since ALL Scripture is God-breathed, I think it best that we at least have a look at it!
The
Hand
| Image from Web |
The
ink is mentioned in another two places, i.e., 2 Corinthians 3:3 and 1 John 12. The
word for ink in those places just means that which is “black.” Apparently, ink
was prepared from soot or vegetable or mineral substances. Gum and vitriol were
also used, and some of the inks were also red and gold. Paul used the word
“ink” in 2 Corinthians 3:3. Therefore, we can conclude thus far that Paul has a
reed pen in his hand and he is using black ink.
| Image from Web |
Right
then, what we have thus far, is the Apostle Paul sitting with a sharpened cane
reed in his hand, perhaps his left-hand. He is dipping the sharpened cane reed
into black ink made from soot mixed with some liquid. And he is writing on...
Well, what is he using for paper?
The
word “paper” is used by the Apostle John in 2 John 12. “Having many things to
write to you, I do not wish to do so with paper and ink...” The paper there
would be papyrus. Papyrus was a tall, smooth reed, pasted together horizontally
and vertically under pressure. Other writing materials would be leaves of the
olive tree and palm leaves. They even wrote on the rinds of pomegranates and
animal skins, presumably dead and cured! And also on tablets, like the one
mentioned in Luke 1:63. “And he asked for a writing tablet...” But Paul here
has the cane reed in his hand, perhaps his left-hand. And he’s writing with
black ink upon papyrus probably.
But
what is he writing? Well, we know for certain that he’s writing the verse we’re
looking at! But what about the rest of this Epistle to the Galatians? Well, we
may safely conclude that he’s writing from this verse (v.11) through to the end
of the letter (i.e., v. 18). But what about the rest of the letter, didn’t he
write that? Well, Paul was in the habit of using, what is called an amanuensis.
An amanuensis is simply a scribe or a secretary. Paul would dictate the letter,
and the amanuensis would write it down. Then Paul would write a concluding
remark with his own hand. Eg, 1 Corinthians 16:21 “The salutation with my own
hand – Paul.” Colossians 4:18 “This salutation by my own hand – Paul.” And
listen to what he says in 2 Thessalonians 3:17, “The salutation of Paul with my
own hand, which is a sign in every epistle; so I write.” So, in light of that
verse, and one or two other factors, I’m inclined to think that Paul wrote only
the concluding remarks to the Galatians with his own hand. Whether you go along
with me on this or not, is neither here nor there.
You might quote me Galatians 1:20 where Paul says: “Now concerning the things which I write to you...” But this doesn’t preclude the view that Paul is dictating to his secretary. But let’s grab hold of what we do know for certain. Here’s the Apostle saying in Galatians 4:11 that he is writing to the Galatians with his own hand and not the hand of another. He is giving the letter his personal touch.
The
Handwriting
I
remember the first time I used my computer to write a letter to my dad in
Scotland. As I wrote I could just imagine him thinking as he read it: “Son,
this is cold! I don’t want some computer print-out! I want to see your own
handwriting! I want the personal touch – the touch of my son’s own hand!”
You
know, some people have made a business out of analysing handwriting. They
reckon they can tell you all sorts of things about a person by his or her style
of handwriting. Well, I don’t want to make too much of that but I’m sure
there’s something in it. However, here’s Paul inviting the Galatians to analyse
his handwriting. He is drawing their attention to the large characters he’s
using. Is he using upper-case letters whereas the amanuensis before him used
lower case? Well, it would be nice if we had the original letter and we could
check all this, but we don’t! But what we do have is a difficult grammatical
Greek construction going on in this verse
It’s
not that easy to know whether Paul is talking about the entire letter to the
Galatians. Or is he talking about his ABCDEFG, i.e., alphabetical, type of
letters. The KJV goes for the former, for it renders this verse: “Ye see how
large a letter [singular] I have written unto you with mine own hand.” Whereas
the NKJV has the word “letter” in the plural “letters” as does the NIV.
I
certainly favour “letters of the alphabet” over “letter” as in “epistle” for a
couple of reasons. The two letters to the Corinthians, and the ones to the
Romans and the Ephesians are larger than this one to the Galatians. And that’s
not counting the Letter to the Hebrews which possibly may have been written by
him. Then there’s the grammar. The word in question may be translated either
way. But I go along with Herman Ridderbos who says, “It is generally accepted
that letters is the right version.”
Now
then, why is Paul using such large letters, or characters? This is the point
where some people start to speculate about Paul’s eyesight. They’ll tell you
that Paul’s thorn in his flesh was poor eyesight. They’ll tell you that it was
because he was blinded on the road to Damascus. However, is this the real
reason why he is writing with such big letters? Well, I think this line of
reasoning is a wee bit flawed.
Paul
was a scholar. Read the book of Romans if you don’t believe me. The Apostle was
an academic to the highest degree – the Rev. Prof. Dr. Paul. Paul was a man of
letters, (even if he did count them as dung for the sake of Christ!) Paul wrote
Galatians before he wrote 2 Timothy. Yet in 2 Timothy 4:13 he is asking for his
books and his parchments to be brought to him. Therefore, we might conclude
that he is still capable of study.
Right
then, what does that have to do with his eyesight? Well, wouldn’t Paul want to
read through his letter to the Galatians before he stuck it in the mailbox? This
was an extremely important letter. Surely, he would want to make sure he was
satisfied with what he had written before he sent it.
A
friend of mine once told about a letter he wished he’d taken time to read again
before he sent it. He sent a letter to the Government of Australia. He told
them in no uncertain terms where they could go! He regretted his rashness in
sending that letter! Paul the Apostle is not a rash man like my friend. He’s
going to read and re-read his letter to make sure it’s just right. And, not to
mention the fact that the Holy Spirit gave him 10/10 for it. And even saw to it
that it was included in the Canon of Scripture! Paul got this letter just
right, the way he wanted it. One wrong word and all could have been lost with
the Galatians! So, I tend not to follow the poor eye-sight theory for
the large letters.
So,
what is with Paul writing with such large letters? Well, we certainly need to
be careful about drawing any final conclusions, but here’s my two-cents worth:
The
view I hold on this verse is based on a biblical principle and precedent. It
should be noted, as will become clear to us as we continue our study of the
rest of this chapter, that verse 11 to the end of the letter is basically a
summary and restatement of the whole Epistle. It is Paul’s conclusion – his
“therefore.”
In
verse 12-13 he mentions again the problem the letter is written to address, i.e.,
salvation by works. In verse 14 he mentions again the solution, i.e., salvation
by grace alone; which is on account of Christ’s cross alone. And that this is
received through faith alone, which is what he means by glorying in the cross.
In
verse 15 he spells it out one more time that in Christ Jesus works of the flesh
count for nothing. It’s being regenerated and converted, i.e., being a new
creation, which counts with God. Then, one more time, in verses 16-17 he
mentions the fruit of the Spirit, which is the evidence of being a new
creation. And then in the very last verse he mentions that word “grace” again,
i.e., the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ.
So
then, the biblical principle and precedent that I mentioned is this: The
principle is “grace” and the precedent is “the personal touch.” “See with what
large letters I have written to you with my own hand.”
Paul,
is the Lord’s Apostle – chosen by Jesus Christ Himself. That’s what Paul tells
us in the very first line of this Epistle. He has the authority of Jesus Christ
to write to these wavering Galatians. In chapter 1:3 he writes, “Grace to you and
peace from God the Father and our Lord Jesus Christ.” God then, is declaring
His grace and peace to these Galatians through His instrument, the Apostle
Paul. In his office of an Apostle, Paul is an ambassador of God. He has been
set apart by Jesus Christ as His representative of God’s grace on earth.
Now
then, Paul used amanuensis, i.e., scribes or secretaries to write for him,
we’ve seen that. I don’t know if there are any of his letters which DON’T
mention the grace of God at the beginning. In all of them he declares the grace
of God at the outset. The Epistle to the Hebrews, if written by Paul, would be
the only exception. However, the very last line of that letter has these words:
“Grace be with you al. Amen.” But the point I make is that Paul, as the Lord’s
representative, in his Epistles, is declaring the grace of God. That’s the
biblical principle I’m talking about.
The
whole Bible is the written declaration of God’s grace! The whole Bible is God’s
Epistle – His Letter – declaring His grace. But God Himself used amanuensis,
you know, scribes or secretaries to write His Letter of Grace down for Him. Whether
it be Moses, Jeremiah, Malachi, or Matthew, Mark, Luke or John, these were God’s secretaries –
as was the Apostle Paul.
Now,
to be sure, God didn’t dictate to them what to write, directly. But He did so
in a way that, what they wrote, was exactly what God intended them to write. Even
though the Prophets and the Apostles wrote their own thoughts, they each wrote
God’s mind on the matter. And though the Bible records God’s threatenings and
punishments towards unrepentant sinners, it is indeed the record of His grace
to undeserving sinners, such as ourselves.
| Image from Web |
God
set the precedent for the personal touch in His letter, Paul followed God’s
lead! God used tablets of stone and carved into them using His own finger. Paul
probably used papyrus a pen made out of cane and ink made out of soot. And what
could we learn about the personality of God by studying His handwriting those
two tablets? Did God use large letters when He wrote with His own hand? And
don’t the Ten Commandments start with the grace of God? “I am the LORD your God
who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.”
However, let’s not get too carried away. Let’s just note that the Apostle Paul
followed God’s principle of Grace. And that he also followed God’s precedent of
“the personal touch.”
But,
what about the principle subject of the whole Bible? What about the principle
subject of Paul’s whole Epistle to the Galatians? What about Jesus Christ, the
epitome of God’s grace? Who is Jesus Christ if He is not the Word of God in the
flesh? Is there any more of a personal touch to be found than in Jesus Christ? God
wrote His letter of Grace in His Son Jesus Christ!
If
Paul wrote the Epistle to the Hebrews, then he does start it with grace after
all. For that Epistle open with these words, “God, who at various times and in
different ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these
last days spoken to us by His Son...”
God wrote the Ten Commandments of His Covenant in clay tablets by His own hand. And He wrote the final salutation of His Covenant using His Son as the pen and His blood as the ink! This is the grace of God, and it doesn’t get any more personal than this. Not only is Jesus the paper and ink that God used to declare His grace, but Jesus is also the handwriting of God! And He is the finger of God, He is the hand of God! For Jesus is God, and the all the Scriptures speak of Him.
Conclusion
We’ve
seen then, something of God’s own hand and God’s own handwriting in this verse
of Scripture that could almost be overlooked, “See with what large letters I
have written to you with my own hand!”
No comments:
Post a Comment