Monday, December 31, 2018

"ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL"


“All Men Are Created Equal”
Thomas Jefferson, the main author of the U.S. Declaration of Independence, is attributed as the first to make use of an idea that was popular during the American War for Independence that all men are born free and equal. However, note how Jefferson phrases the concept: “All men are created equal”. The way that the idea is phrased unmistakably and unashamedly makes reference to God. For, that word, i.e., created, can only mean one thing. To be created presuppose a creator, and in this case, the Creator. The literary context in which this phrase is found pushes it beyond argument,

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Add to this what is written in the previous chapter, i.e., “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”, means that only the deluded and disingenuous would attempt to deny that Almighty God is being referenced in the Declaration. Also, to say that all men “are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights” is to say that all men know by nature that they are created equal because all men have the same Creator. Also, keep in mind that all “Laws” presuppose a Lawgiver, in this case, God.

The historical context also bears this out. The signers of the Declaration had been deeply influenced by the teachings of the Bible. In other words, Christianity had penetrated and permeated every nook and cranny of American society at that time – as indicated by the wording of the Declaration. Thus, both the literary context and the historical context serve to illustrate to the open-minded reader that the U.S. Declaration of Independence is intended to be read and understood by Christians in a Christian context. To read it as otherwise is to dishonour the document and those who wrote and signed it. These men were laying their very lives on the line for something they believed, and something believed in, inter alia, that “all men are created equal” by the Creator. Thus, after winning their independence, America became a great experiment, a Christian experiment. Says John Eidsmoe,

Scottish youths who fought for Bonnie Prince Charlie were put to death by the thousands, using the cruellest forms of execution… Hundreds of thousands fled Scotland, most of them finding refuge in North America.
That was in the late 1740s. Thirty years later, in the 1770s, the next generation of Scottish-Americans became leaders in the American War for Independence. In England the war was often called the “Presbyterian Rebellion,” and Prime Minister Horace Walpole commented that “Cousin America has run off with a Presbyterian parson,” an obvious reference to Rev. John Witherspoon, Scottish immigrant, President of the College of New Jersey, and a signer of the Declaration of Independence.[1]

Clearly Horace Walpole, the British Prime minister at the time, along with the whole of Britain, believed that they were fighting against a Christian movement, i.e., the “Presbyterian Rebellion”, during the American War for Independence. They ought to know. How so? They lived then!

“All men are created equal”. What does this statement mean exactly? Can a Feminist endorse this idea? Can a Calvinist? Can an Afro-American. Again, may I remind you of the literary and historical contexts of this statement. It must be read as a Christian statement and understood in a Christian context. In other words, this statement is not open to spin. Yes, feel free to disagree with all of it or portions thereof. But do not bend and twist the statement in an attempt to make it say something it never intended.

Does “all men” mean that women, children, Afro-Americans and the non-elect are excluded? Of course not! The statement means that every human being regardless of skin-colour, ethnicity, sex, age, creed mental capacity, whether Christian or not has been created equal on account of being part of the human race. All humans are created equal. In the historical context this was expressed by saying “all men”, which means of course both male and female. It does not mean, e.g., that all Christian old white men are created equal.

The words of the Declaration solidified in an outstanding document that which would follow, i.e., racial and sexual equality. Sure, it took more than two centuries for its fulfillment, and it still needs some work in some areas, but “all men are created equal” is the clear understanding and expressed goal of the Founding Fathers. To say otherwise is to misunderstand them and Christianity.

The Feminist Movement has helped to accomplish what the Founders intended. However, to take umbrage with the word “men” in the Declaration inadvertently is to seek to destroy the very foundations of sexual equality in America.

The Afro-American may look at the lives of the signatories and conclude that they excluded the negro-slave population on account of some of them, including Thomas Jefferson, being slave-owners. Whatever contradictions and inconsistencies were in the Founders’ lives does not change one iota of what they affixed their names to, i.e., “all men are created equal”. You and I are not always consistent with our beliefs. But all good men, i.e., all good human beings, given time, try to be.

And what about the Christian Calvinists? A lot of these are Presbyterian like the signatory Rev. John Witherspoon. Are all human beings created equal? What about the elect and the non-elect? Calvinists get into discussions about such things as Predestination and Double-Predestination. Did God elect or choose one lot of humanity for Heaven and elect or choose another lot for Hell in eternity past, i.e., before He brought any human beings into His creation? Some Calvinists hold to a Supralapsarian view and others an Infralapsarian view. In either view the end result is that some Calvinists may question the accuracy of the statement “all men are created equal” on the assumption that those who do not belong to God, i.e., the non-elect of God, cannot in every sense be equal to those who do. However, the statement “all men are created equal” was not written as part of a theological treatise, for who but God alone can ultimately tell His elect from the non-elect? You and I can only guess at best! Therefore, the Founders are quite right to state that “all men are created equal” because the hidden things belong to God. No one can say to God on Judgment Day that they did not know that God existed. “All men are created equal” and, as the Declaration puts it, “are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights”. If the Creator has endowed you with something, something “unalienable”, then you already know in your heart that God exists! Therefore, “all men ARE created equal”, because all human beings, according to the Founders, are created by the Creator who witnesses His existence to them, for He has endowed them with “certain unalienable rights”.

Recently I had a book called Jefferson’s Tears published. About some of the content of this book I said, 
The USA is the great Christian experiment on the North American continent. Liberia, based on the American one, is the great Christian experiment on the African continent. Both hit roadblocks, civil war, relating to race. This issue will never fully be resolved unless and until we get back to the Declaration of Independence generally, and particularly those words of Thomas Jefferson, “All men are created equal”.
            The invisible hand of God, i.e., Providence, was made visible with the founding of the U.S. Its people shook their fist in the face of tyranny when it published its Declaration of Independence. It is a nation solely founded on the will of the people, i.e., a Christianised people. Like its Declaration, its subsequent Constitution is next to useless if its people do not view it in the context of Christians and Christianity. Destroy these foundations and the Republic is destroyed.
“Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?” “A Republic, if you can keep it.” —attributed to Benjamin Franklin at the close of the Constitutional Convention.[2]      
Why destroy something beautiful? Even if you are not a Christian surely you can see that the intention of the Founders was a Christian Republic? Sure, that does not mean that everyone in the Republic needs to be a Christian.

The Church on earth includes sheep as well as goats, but it’s still the Church. The Church and the State are two separate entities. They may have different functions but they both belong to one nation under God.

Says the late Presbyterian D. James Kennedy

“God loves America. When you consider what He went through to bring our forbearers to this magnificent land, and when you realize what He accomplished in bringing forth a new nation on this continent – a government founded on Christian principles... you have to realize that He had a dramatic vision and purpose for this nation.”[3]

[1] John Eidsmoe, Historical and Theological Foundations of Law: Volume 2, Classical and Medieval, Expanded Second Edition, printed November 2016, Nordskog Publishing Inc., Ventura, California, p. 787.

[3] D. James Kennedy, Truths That Transform: Christian Doctrines for Your Life Today.

Friday, December 28, 2018

SAMPLE CHAPTERS OF JEFFERSON'S TEARS

The following is a sample of the first couple of chapters of Jefferson’s Tears from Nordskog Publishing:

Prologue
STARS & SCARS

With a crash the main door of the house burst open as half a dozen or so very tall young men, armed with weapons, rushed through the opening. They were yelling and screaming at the house’s occupants: a nine-year-old boy, and a twenty-one-year-old female and her two little children. It was as if a tropical storm had entered the room. Things were being tossed around, including the room’s innocent occupants. The tall men started slapping, punching, and kicking the pair as the young woman tried to protect her children. She became their main focus of attention. The young boy saw another man, an older man, slowly appear through the same entrance, the doorway that he had been considering escaping through. At first he was silhouetted; then, as he slowly walked into the room, the boy could see that he was dressed in mismatched army fatigues. One of his front teeth was broken. In a scary voice he yelled, “I’m looking for government officials to kill! Those dogs are eating up all our country’s money!” 
The boy saw him wave his gun and that he had angry eyes. Next, via another door, another man appeared in the room, and behind him came yet another man. They were wondering what all the fuss was about. Unfortunately, these two were Liberian government officials. The first government official began speaking in a startled voice to the older man with the broken front tooth, “I know you. You worked in our office!” “Yeah, and you got me fired from that office. I lost my job all because of you!” The older man in the mismatched fatigues pointed his gun straight at the man. “But I caught you stealing a document, a classified document from the office,” added the government official, as his wide eyes looked down the barrel of the intruder’s gun. This time his voice sounded squeaky. “It was only a piece of paper! You got me fired over a miserable piece of paper. And for that it’s now time for me to take my revenge!” The terrified nine-year-old closely watched the scene as it developed. His scared eyes looked at each of the tall, dark figures in the room. He wondered what was going to happen next. The government official with the gun pointing at him was shaking. Realizing what was about to happen, he said, “Please don’t kill the children! Take my life, but please leave the children and my brother out of this.” The older man spat out his reply through his broken tooth, “Don’t worry. I will make you suffer the way you made me suffer. I lost my job! But now I have a good job —   which is to finish you off      along with all those that hurt me in the past.”
Then the older rebel said to the younger men in the room, “You boys, why don’t you have some fun with her? While I watch.” Immediately, one of the young men began to rip at the young woman’s clothing and then he lay on top of her on the floor. The others were holding her down as she struggled and screamed. The boy watched the second government official, the brother of the first, who had just appeared in the room, try to help the girl. But before he could, the older man with the mismatched army fatigues fired his weapon. The deafening shot echoed in the nine-year-old’s head like a sonic boom. Then in the moment’s silence afterward, he could hear his own heart beat as he watched, as if in slow motion, the man who had been shot as he fell to the floor. He couldn’t make out the words he was saying, but the callous shooter started yelling angrily, firing his weapon a few more times into the man as he lay on the floor. There was blood. The boy could hear himself inwardly screaming for help. Then outwardly. The men began beating him and the girl some more. Then yet a different young man began to lay himself on top of the young woman. She was screaming too. Screaming! As he continued screaming for help he could see the first government official trying to reach him. But, with his teeth gritted, the older man with the gun was holding him back by his shirt. His would-be rescuer was thrown to the floor. The older man hissed through his broken tooth, “Your brother is dead all because he wanted to be a hero to save his daughter. And now you are doing the same! Come over here, you dog.” 
He watched helplessly as the older man in the mismatched fatigues dragged the Liberian government official across the floor, saying, “This dog is mine!” His younger cohorts were too busy with the young woman to notice or to care. The nine-year-old took in the chaotic scene. He stopped screaming and simply stood and trembled. His big, dark, unblinking eyes were tear-filled. Then right in front of everyone, the older man smiled, an evil broken-tooth smile, and calmly shot the man in the head. The sound of the gunshot began to echo through eternity. There was more blood. A great teardrop rolled down the boy’s face . . .   
Jefferson woke up with a start. He was panting as if he had been running. His wife, Princess, had seen her husband go through this before. “Was it the same nightmare as before, Jeff?” She spoke with soft and sympathetic tones, partly because she didn’t want to wake the children and partly to comfort her husband. It was Brisbane, Queensland. And it was the middle of the night. The streetlights were giving off a filtered glow through the curtains. “Yeah. I know it was just a bad dream. But his face with that broken tooth still haunts me. I’m sorry, Babe. I hope I wasn’t making too much noise. The kids?”
Jefferson Williams Kollie is not tall in stature. He’s about five foot six inches. However, what he lacks in height he makes up for in physique. He could be a middleweight boxer. His black skin ripples with well toned and sculpted muscles. His biceps suggest a regular weightlifting regimen. 
In the dim light Jefferson looked across the room. He could see his neatly pressed Australian Army uniform, ready for the morning, hanging on the back of the slightly ajar bedroom door. His dark eyes locked onto the little Australian flag depicted on its shoulder patch. He studied it and could just make out the Southern Cross star formation depicted thereon. He thought out loud, “I’m free now. We really are in Australia.” He instinctively lifted and glanced at his phone that lay on his bedside table. In its silvery glow, his wife could see beads of sweat sparkling like stars in the night sky on his black forehead. “Princess, I need to step outside for some fresh air.” “Take your time. I’ll check on the kids,” she replied. “I love you.” “And I you,” she replied. Then she kissed him and went to check on their children. It was 0200 on a clear and balmy night. The summer weather in subtropical Queensland is not unlike that of Liberia. Jefferson clicked the locking mechanism and quietly slid open the security flyscreen door. He stepped outside. His big, dark, unblinking eyes were tear-filled. The emotion he was feeling at that moment was one of thankfulness. Deep in thought, he lifted his shiny dark eyes and looked to the star-clustered heavens and searched for and found the Southern Cross formation. “Yeah, I’m free. No more running. Thank God this is Australia, not Liberia. Thank You, Lord!” Just then, a star shot across the night sky. Upon seeing this, a great teardrop rolled down his face and splashed on the ground.
Every human being has a potent story to tell. Perhaps if Jefferson’s story were to be distilled and then poured into a glass, the golden elixir could be called Resilience. What’s resilience? Let’s call it spring-back-ability. Perhaps the old adage made famous by a certain brand of watches best sums up resilience: “Takes a licking and keeps on ticking.” What Jefferson has gone through in his life would make an ordinary man or woman all bitter and twisted. However, like something made of rubber after being run over by a steamroller, Jefferson just springs back to life and gets on with it      with a smile. Jefferson’s story is a tale of tears from a vale of tears, real salty tears. However, they have been wiped away by the handkerchief of love, a woman’s love.
Chapter 1
LIBERTY ON THE HORIZON
Somewhere in the Atlantic Sunday, March 15, 1829 
The wooden bow of Harriet gently splashed its way through the calm salty brine toward West Africa’s coast, somewhere in the far-off hazy distance. The ship of 160 souls, many of whom were presently milling around on deck, had set sail from Virginia. The brig was making good time on her way to Monrovia, Liberia. 
“I hear that this is a special day for you?” This was the commander of the ship, Captain Henry Peters, one of those ageless types of men. 
“‘This is the day which the Lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it,’” replied the young man whom the captain had addressed. 
Joseph Jenkins Roberts brushed his fingers through his grizzled reddish-brown hair as he looked into the captain’s face, which suddenly had become rather stern. Seeing that the captain had tilted his head as if to register slight disdain, he quickly added, “However, sir, I do believe that it is my birthday to which you allude, and not to the Lord’s Day?” 
There were others standing around on deck, both young and old. So, to make their conversation more private, they turned and leaned on the ship’s rail and instinctively looked towards the horizon. Yes, it was the Lord’s Day, the Christian Sabbath, and it was as if even the sea itself were observing a day of rest. The sky was blue and the turquoise ocean was calm. 
“Sir, I turned twenty today, and I make passage to Monrovia with my newly widowed mother to start a new life, along with my wife and our newborn child. Of my two younger brothers, one desires to become a Methodist priest, the other a physician. With God’s blessing, I desire to honor Him in the mercantile business, through which I seek to import and export goods to and from Monrovia, with the able assistance of my partner-in-business who remains domiciled in Virginia for the time being.” 
“A merchant? Did someone, I forget who, not say, ‘Merchants have no country’?” This the captain said hastily. He was a little taken aback. He had not expected such an educated response from a Negro. He studied the features of the young man a little more closely. Perhaps he was not a Negro. Though his skin was olive-colored, he did look like he could pass as a white man, but then again, maybe not. Intrigued, he decided to dig a little deeper. 
“Are you travelling to Monrovia under the sponsorship of the American Colonization Society?” He adjusted his captain’s hat. He had removed it a few minutes prior, during the Sunday morning worship service. There were still so many people crowding around on deck. 
Joseph Jenkins Roberts patted down his hair once more and he raised himself to his full height of five foot six inches. Yes, a slight man, but his diminutive stature was deflected by his handsome features and his poise. 
Joseph responded to the captain’s question with a smile, and in Southern intonations, volunteered the following, “Yes, Captain, I am traveling under the auspices of the American Colonization Society. As are most of your passengers, I’d wager.” Then, becoming more impassioned, he went on to say, “We are thankful that, through President Monroe, America was able to purchase that strip of land that now bears his good name: Monrovia. In God’s Providence, the land has now, according to my research, expanded into what during these last five years people have been entitling, ‘Liberia,’ which, as you of course know, means ‘freedom,’ or better, ‘The Land of the Free’.” 
Wishing to probe further into the young man’s story, the captain tilted his hat back on his head, wiped with a kerchief the moisture from his white forehead, and said, “By your accent I would wager that you are Virginian. And by your erudition I would say that you were university educated. Why then would you not wish to seek ‘Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness’ in America, rather than in some far-flung, disease-infested, foreign swamp land?” 
“Captain, sir, you misjudge me. Indeed, I may have a ‘liberal education,’ as they call it. However, I first trained as a flat-boatman on the James and Appomattox rivers, carrying goods. Thus, my interest in being a merchant. And I have also worked as a barber in Petersburg, on Union Street.” He patted his hair once more, laughed, and said, “But I never learned to cut my own hair! 
“Indeed, William Colson, now my business partner, owned the store in which I worked as a barber. I am grateful to his erudition, and to his vast library, for my ‘liberal education.’ The study of law, including international law, now being my primary interest.” 
Seeing he had a captive audience in the captain, and that others were now straining their ears to hear what this young man had to say, he continued, “My father has newly gone off to Glory. As to my education, even were I university trained, which I am not, though I have been mistaken on occasion for a white man, the color of my skin would somewhat hinder me, and perhaps even preclude me, from seeking Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness in my home country. Captain, sir, you have twice quoted Thomas Jefferson, first, with your ‘merchants have no country’ comment, and secondly, let me add that though President Jefferson may have written those Lockean words that you have just mentioned, he indeed also has written: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. . . . ’ That word ‘happiness’ was changed from the word ‘property’ in the original draft. I oft wonder if it should have been left in the former. But the meaning is essentially the same. It seems to me that both happiness and property are other words for prosperity.” 
He turned and faced the small gathering and continued, “Captain, sir, may I continue?”
Captain Peters scanned the audience, and seeing that all the pleading faces were in a mood to listen, decided to indulge the young Roberts. “Yes, do carry on. We are all ears!” 
Yes, in a mood to listen, the group moved in closer to the orator. 
Joseph took a deep breath as he collected his thoughts. “As I was saying, the Declaration of Independence goes on to say      let me see now, where was I? ‘Unalienable Rights   . . .   and the pursuit of Happiness’      That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,      That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation . . . ” 
As if they had not been paying attention enough, the word “foundation” leapt out at them, causing the audience to turn its collective ear even more in the direction of the orator. That word had been in the text used by the preacher for the morning’s sermon, Psalm 11:3, “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” Young Joseph was about to build upon the preacher’s message. The boat gently swayed and its timbers could be heard to creak gently as the crowd stood in silent anticipation.
Joseph looked the crowd directly in the face, smiled, and then continued, “To institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” 
The young man stopped there, as the crowd wondered if he had memorized the whole Declaration of Independence. 
As if reading the crowd’s mind, he continued, “Yes, I do have the whole of the Declaration memorized! However, suffice for now, I humbly and mostly desire to bring to your attention, if you would permit me, three main things.” 
At that he looked down at a young boy who had positioned himself to the front of the crowd in order to see who was doing all the talking. “Young man, what is your name?” 
The boy, looking over his shoulder and up at all the many faces of the crowd, cleared his throat and said, “James, sir. My name is James Spriggs Payne.” The crowd applauded the boy’s courage in attempting the onerous exercise of public speaking. 
“Well, James Spriggs Payne, pray, tell me how old are you?” 
“Nine years? Well, James Spriggs Payne, the first thing I want to say is, thank you for answering me!” He touched the boy’s head and made a gesture as if he were about to cut the lad’s hair. The crowd chuckled. Then, as if addressing only the boy, Joseph went on to say, “Thomas Jefferson, who went to be with the Lord less than three years ago, indeed did write those words, ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.’ So, my first point is this . . . 
” He looked at the boy again and said, “‘All men are created equal.’ What does this mean? That we always should treat others as our equal? Nay lad, let’s go the extra mile and let us do as the Bible says, ‘In lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.’ Therefore, do not mistreat anyone. I know that some of you here have been mistreated, even severely mistreated, but believe what the Declaration says: ‘All men are created equal.’ And secondly, you know already that the Creator has endowed you with certain unalienable rights. You know this because that is what is in your heart. 
“There are things that even James at his young age yearns after, yes, ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness’.” He looked again at the boy. “James wants to live, he wants to live free, so that he is not hindered in pursuing those things, those lawful things, that make him happy. And lastly, for you and for me to be enabled to seek Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, we must needs have a government that will protect us in all our lawful pursuits, and not instead become tyrannical, which is to say that we wish for the government not to lord it over us.” 
Still looking at the boy, Joseph continued to wax eloquent, “James, this means that we need a group of grownups to look out for us, to look after us. How so? How ought a government look after us and look out for us? Simply by promoting the doing of good, while commending those who do good, and to be about the business of punishing evildoers. ‘For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.’ 
“We are some ten days out from Liberia, ‘The Land of the Free.’ When we arrive there, may we each as free individuals, and as a free people, lay good foundations, Biblical foundations to build upon. I wish you young James, I wish everyone in our new land, Life, Liberty, and pursuit of Happiness!” 
As if he had clearly understood everything, the boy firmly nodded his head towards Joseph as the crowd applauded. It had been the boy’s father, Rev. David M. Payne, a Methodist minister, who had led the worship service earlier that morning. Slowly the crowd began to disperse. 
Before Joseph took his leave, the captain said to him, “I perceive you to be a politician, and an exceedingly good and clever one at that. We shall talk some more anon. I have duties to attend to for now.” 
“‘Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.’” “Indeed! And enjoy your birthday!” replied Captain Peters. 
Something had awakened in the heart of Joseph Jenkins Roberts. But he wasn’t quite sure what. In the company of his own thoughts he once again looked out at the horizon as if trying to penetrate eternity. He unconsciously patted down his hair as a knowing smile came upon his face. He quoted a verse of Scripture out loud, as a prayer, “Ethiopia shall soon stretch out her hands unto God.” 
The Harriet with her valuable cargo continued to splash gently on her way to destiny.

Thursday, December 27, 2018

AUTHOR REVIEW OF JEFFERSON'S TEARS


Jefferson’s Tears: Author Review
Author/Artist Review (at christianbook.com) 
Author: Neil McKinlay
Located in: Brisbane, Australia
Submitted: December 25, 2018

    Tell us a little about yourself.  
I’m a Christian, married with three daughters, four grandchildren and a West Highland Terrier. I love reading, writing and playing soccer.
    What was your motivation behind this project?  
Jefferson’s Tears was a story that had to be told. I met and interviewed Jefferson only to discover that he was named after Thomas Jefferson. Thus I began to research the story of Liberia and, like Jefferson’s name, it has multiple connections with America, its founding and founders. Liberia (i.e., the Land of the Free) is essentially a black version of USA. Like the US, after its founding Liberia descended into civil war. Jefferson was born into this and miraculously survived its terrors. God is given the glory for safely guiding Jefferson through this and subsequently delivering him. Both my and Jefferson’s motivation behind this project is the glory of God.
    What do you hope folks will gain from this project?  
I hope folks will gain a deeper appreciation of the God-given freedoms we in the West enjoy and seek to retain them. The USA is the great Christian experiment on the North American continent. Liberia, based on the American one, is the great Christian experiment on the African continent. Both hit roadblocks, i.e., civil war, relating to race. This issue will never be fully resolved unless and until we get back to the Declaration of Independence generally, and particularly those words of Thomas Jefferson, “All men are created equal”. Whether white or black, Americo-Liberian or white resident of Liberia etc. the full ramifications of those Biblically endorsed words need to be studied, fully understood and applied. It is the very essence of human freedom on earth. Folks will gain a deeper insight and hopefully a deeper appreciation of The Declaration, Constitution and Bill of Rights of these two related countries.
    How were you personally impacted by working on this project?  
Jefferson’s resilient character and nature impacted me. How can someone who has gone through what he has gone through still have it all together? How does he manage to keep it together? He loves his job in the Australian Army. He smiles and sings as he does his work. But what about all your painful baggage Jefferson? The Lord is his Shepherd. As we read your harrowing story may it help encourage us to trust in the Lord daily too! Jefferson's childlike faith impacted me as I worked on this project. It still does.
    Who are your influences, sources of inspiration or favorite authors / artists?  
Though not necessarily my favourite authors, both the styles of writing of Bill O’Reilly and Dan Brown influenced me in the writing of Jefferson’s Tears. O’Reilly for his time and date at the head of each chapter in his “Killing…” series, and Brown for his cliff-hanger approach at the end of each of his chapters in The Da Vinci Code et al. The “time and date” at the beginning of each chapter serves to get and hold the reader in the “present tense” of the action, also it supplies the reader with the important historical context. The cliff-hanger at the end of each, or at least some of the chapters urges the reader to want to return to that part of the story while reading new action and information. I like the poetic prose of Scottish writer James Barke, but I tried to keep Jefferson's Tears cinematic rather than verbose. 

See: Jefferson's Tears on Christianbook at: 
https://www.christianbook.com/jeffersons-tears-neil-mckinlay/9781946497345/pd/497345?event=ERRPDPRV

Wednesday, December 26, 2018

A CHRISTMAS STORY


A Christmas Story
or
It Was a Dark and Stormy Night
Merry Christmas to all. I was returning felicitations to my pal Jim McGhee, a fellow hack, and it ended up as a whimsical pastiche. I would appreciate your professional critique (hopefully free of charge). 

A Christmas Story: It was a dark and stormy night as the crime writer sat down at his Edwardian writing bureau to write. The shadow of a shadowy figure moved across the deserted shadowy garden and the french windows’ silken curtains flickered and wafted negligently in the night-time breeze as the shadowy figure entered the well-appointed yet gloomy interior. He had had had enough, the dark shadowy figure had concluded, of the crime writer's infuriating denouements when a mysterious figure never before mentioned entered the narrative, guilty of the lurid crime that had baffled all. Well no more! On he crept in the shadowy shadows. The crime writer was illumined by his small low-powered computer screen, a hand behind him silently rose (a vicious dagger in silhouette against the nicotined ceiling) and plunged as the crime writer wrote his final words in this world: “A Merry Christmas to all my rea...”
Written by my big brother Stuart McKinlay.

Stuart: Incidentally, I’m swithering whether for consistency of scene-setting verisimilitude, in the night-time breeze should be in the dark and stormy night-time breeze, but I’m not precious about it. Continue to have a Merry Christmas. Judge and Jury: The nicotined ceiling, I hear you aver, is a splendid sleight of suggestion, placing the reader in an involuntary ambiguity: acquiescence in false concrete reality, the ceiling, and an abstract judgmentalism, the nicotine, the real and unreal at one. While abhorring the dastardly deed accruing before their very mind’s eye, simultaneously thinking the victim deserves all he gets for smoking. Another triumph, I hear you cackle, as you continue with your Merry Christmas. It's only self-parody.
Stuart: A Christmas Story
It was a dark and stormy night as the crime writer sat down at his Edwardian writing bureau to write. 
Neil: There is so much compacted into this opening and enticing hook-line. For, the reader is immediately made aware of the time of day (i.e., “night”) and the mood of the day (i.e., “dark and stormy”). Thus, the ambience of the set of the scene is set. The reader can just about hear the intermittent window-spatters of gusts of rain as he/she peels back the damp and heavy drapes to attempt to peer penetratively through the electrically charged oppressive darkness in a subliminally subconscious attempt to assist the introduced subject (i.e., “the crime writer”) to find his muse. Though the “Edwardian writing bureau” is suggestive of an ordered train of prosaic thought, it does add to the sullen and sombre atmospherics as the writer, the crime writer, takes up his pen to write, er, i.e., his fired-up and somewhat dimly-lit word-processor. 
Dorothy (Neil’s wife): Surely this cannot be set in Scotland?
Stuart: The shadow of a shadowy figure moved across the deserted shadowy garden and the french windows' silken curtains flickered and wafted negligently in the night-time breeze as the shadowy figure entered the well-appointed yet gloomy interior.
Neil: The previous mood for the reader is lightened somewhat by this longish second sentence. The story’s antagonist, though yet opaque, is early identified. A garden of shadows. One shadow solid. Instead of having to negotiate limp and cumbersome Edwardian drapes the crime writer’s nemesis now is able to enter his study on the silent wings of the night-time breeze. A shadow without easily becomes a shadow within, metamorphosed by french windows and silken curtains. A killer butterfly? Nay, a great ghastly and hairy garden moth! One cannot help but think of an Edwardian Dracula, yea, verily, a Victorian Dracula transforming himself into a little bat to flutter through a window in the search of and scent of blood. Anticipation! The scene’s intensity rises along with the hairs on the reader’s neck. Hackles and atmospheric crackles. So-o-o Hitchcockian!
Dorothy (Neil’s wife): This cannot be set in Scotland! 
Neil (Dorothy’s husband): Okay then. Why can’t it be set in Scotland? 
Dorothy (Neil’s wife): “A Christmas Story”, that’s why! “The french windows’ silken curtains flickered and wafted negligently in the night-time breeze”. Give me a break! It’s freezing in Scotland at Christmas!
Neil: Er, good point wife.
Stuart: He had had had enough, the dark shadowy figure had concluded, of the crime writer's infuriating denouements when a mysterious figure never before mentioned entered the narrative, guilty of the lurid crime that had baffled all. Well no more! 
Neil: “He had had had enough”, the repetition of the “had” serves to add to the emotional intensity of the tale for the reader, as in the sense of tall, taller, and tallest, or better, kill, killer, and killest! One feels the heat of the scene and sees as it were lightning flashes from the dark cloud that has entered the distracted and unsuspecting crime writer’s airspace. The killer’s blood is running hot and the cauldron of death is about to boil over. There’s death in the black pot of infuriation! The “mysterious figure” adds to this murder-mystery indeed. Is he the garden-shadow incarnate? Is the shadow merely an accomplice? Coincidence perhaps? What is the “lurid crime” that this “mysterious figure never before mentioned” that is anachronistically baffling all with? Is it the present transpiring scene that is being referred to or the story the writer is writing? Or is it both? Uncertainty results in ambivalence. Oh, the story’s tension gets even more intenser! Is he some sort of time-traveller perhaps? A Dr Who-Dunnit? Call the police! Is there a TARDIS parked on a flowerbed outside perhaps? No, we see ahead that there is a “vicious dagger” in that shadowy hand. Not a sonic screwdriver in sight. So, it’s back to the drawing-board, make that drawing-room, for the would-be mystery-solving reader. 
Stuart: On he crept in the shadowy shadows. The crime writer was illumined by his small low-powered computer screen, a hand behind him silently rose (a vicious dagger in silhouette against the nicotined ceiling) and plunged as the crime writer wrote his final words in this world: “A Merry Christmas to all my rea...”
Neil: Again, very Hitchcockian. All silhouettes (with accompanying dramatic music!). Stimulated imagination rather than visual gratification. The “nicotined ceiling” is a master’s touch. It causes the reader to look up. Triumphal cackles or atmospheric crackles? Surely the latter. It suggests, nay, it, in an economy of words, denotes a dedicated writer, one whose very lifeblood is nourished by long hours of writing. The “nicotined ceiling”, caused as it were by fumes from burning midnight oil, all that hard work now about to go up in smoke! Then the irony of the writer’s famous last words as he stabbed them out on his computer. He wishes his murderer “A Merry Christmas” as the plunging daggered-hand closes the scene. Curtains. The irony curtain!
Murder-mystery = 1. Murder. 2. Motive. 3. Method. 4. Mistake. 
The narrative clearly provides the first three of these checkpoints but enticingly leaves number four unresolved and therefore unsolved. Though a “fan” of the writer, the killer ever remains shadowy. Will he perhaps resurface in a sequel or even a prequel to a sequel? No one enjoys being left hanging, swinging in the wind (even if it’s wafting “negligently in the night-time breeze” through french windows and silken curtains). Does this suggest, therefore, the bringing in of a Taggart to say, “Naebody move. Therrr’s been a murrrrdurrrr!”? Does the story really need a Nancy Drew or a Columbo, nay, on account of the aforementioned french windows, an Inspector Clouseau? No! Leave be. Leave well enough alone! Let the reader solve the crime during the wee small hours of the night, when, instead of sleeping the reader gets more entangled in the story, like a writhing fly in a sticky spider’s web. They’re still trying to solve the Victorian Jack the Ripper murders….
Stuart: Neil, I've got to hand it to you: a masterpiece of constructive deconstruction. Never has a satirical ragbag of maladroit cliches been awarded such inspiring forensic examination, delivered with delicious collaborative irony. A Christmas gift that in its dark and shady way just about wraps it up for the deceptive hand that had had the shadowy hand of fate held in its hands. One bows, again, to the master.
Neil: With your permission, I may just steal all of this and stick it on my Snow Off the Ben Blogpage? Or is that being too shadowistically shadowy?
Stuart: Brilliant idea. I’m out with the cat and was writing on foot, without reference. The dark and stormy night line is a famous Victorian intro ridiculed for being copied by would-be novelists. I am indebted to him for this, and I will pass on his name when I get home in a minute or three. 
Dark and stormy etc, first used by Washington Irvine, A History of New York (1809), and then Edward Bulwer-Lytton (1830), the more interesting perpetrator. “It was a dark and stormy night; the rain fell in torrents — except at occasional intervals, when it was checked by a violent gust of wind which swept up the streets (for it is in London that our scene lies), rattling along the housetops, and fiercely agitating the scanty flame of the lamps that struggled against the darkness.” 
I see strictly speaking Bulwer-Lytton's words were not Victorian, but published seven years before heir-presumptive Victoria acceded in 1837 when she became 18. William IV was on the throne. Not a lot of people know that.


Saturday, December 22, 2018

JEFFERSON'S TEARS SUMMARY


“Jefferson’s Tears became my tears” said a friend after she had read my book. I too shed many tears whilst writing it and reviewing what I had written. As I was writing this true story I had in mind that it would affect the reader emotionally. Therefore, as a ship being tossed about and wrecked on heavy seas looks for a harbor so I tried I tried to follow each frenetic and/or emotionally tense chapter with the balm of a calm chapter.
The star of the book is the Liberian Jefferson Kollie Williams (named after Thomas Jefferson) and his dramatic story is “filmed” against the backdrop of the history of the founding of Liberia and its eventual decline into civil war. The apt word “cinematic” has been used to describe the content of Jefferson’s Tears. I purposely use word pictures so that the reader can actually see what was happening rather than just hear about it.
Like a piece of tartan, (can you tell that my background is Scottish?), there are many differently themes, colored-threads if you will, that run the length and breadth of Jefferson’s Tears and can be followed. E.g., there are military, political, philosophical, and Christian themes.
Rather than spell things out I allow you the reader to follow each of the story's threads to make your own discoveries, some of which may be Archimedic! 
·         Thomas Jefferson greatly influenced the founding and ethos of Liberia

·         The issues of racial equality are addressed in Jefferson’s Tears – “All men a created equal…” – Liberia means “liberty” as in “the land of the free”

·         “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness” are alluded to throughout

·         Liberia’s Declaration of Independence is based on America’s Declaration of Independence (same for its Constitution and Bill of Rights)

·         The Republic of Liberia’s Founding fathers were Christians, free blacks from America

·         The meaning of the Separation of Church and State is discussed

·         After a positive beginning, as did the USA, so Liberia descended into violent civil war

·         The invisible hand of God calmly guides young Jefferson through all its chaos to a safe haven 
An analogy from the old tv westerns is used throughout Jefferson’s Tears, “Meanwhile back at the ranch…” I used the same method in my hardcover biographical From Mason To Minister: Through the Lattice where I would run the train of thought along two steel rails to where the rails would meet on the horizon. Therein the theme of one rail was me as the naïve neophyte setting out into the big bad world and the other was the cocksure mature me who has all the answers to the former. Jefferson’s Tears is more like a railway junction with mainlines and sublines and maybe one or two humorous sidelines! The point is that I flit back and forth as I progress the main theme of the story forward.  

Best price? Try Target (on-line):
https://www.target.com/p/jefferson-8217-s-tears-liberia-s-founding-and-fall-one-man-s-horror-and-hope-paperback/-/A-54000583

See Wordery for a copy: 
https://wordery.com/jeffersons-tears-neil-cullan-mckinlay-9781946497345#oid=1003

SKIN FOR SIN


Skin For Sin
Eve gave her husband Adam the forbidden fruit and he ate (Gen. 3:6). Thus Adam broke God’s covenant with man (Hos. 6:7). God had warned Adam that in the day he ate of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, dying he would die (Gen. 2:17). Though married, naked and unashamed (Gen. 2:25), after eating the forbidden fruit the eyes of both of them were opened and they knew they were naked. They were ashamed. So they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves coverings to hide their shame from God (Gen. 3:7). Even so, they were still naked before God. Otherwise He would not have made tunics of skin to cover them (Gen. 3:21). Their nakedness being more than physical signified also conscious guilt before God.

Fig leaves were no longer the fashion. As Rebecca covered her son Jacob with skins of young goats, so the LORD God covered Adam and Eve’s skin with skin. Why skin and not leaves? The Hebrew words for ‘skin’ and ‘naked’ are closely linked. The one implies the other. And, Scripture teaches that without the shedding of blood there is no remission for sins (Heb. 9:22). Therefore in light of the rest of Scripture we take it that the Lord shed the blood of an animal before their eyes to act out the Gospel already heard by the man and his wife (Gen. 3:15). Thus God ‘covered’ their sin.

Did the LORD God crush the serpent’s head, skin it, and wrap its skin around the man and his wife? No. It was the sacrifice of ‘the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world’ that was being pictured (John 1:29). Thus by this original (clean) animal sacrifice the Lord taught Adam and Eve substitutionary atonement. The covenant threat was that in the day Adam ate the forbidden fruit dying he would die. Adam and Eve began dying that very day and would undergo physical death many years later. However, there was substitutionary death that day (probably a ‘clean’ animal such as a sheep).

Adam and Eve passed this knowledge on to their posterity. Thus Noah offered ‘clean’ animals to God after he came out of the ark (Gen. 8:20). So did Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob etc. Detailed instruction of the sacrificial system depicting Gospel ‘substitutionary atonement’ was given to Moses (Lev. 1f.) Thus the ‘Lamb slain from the foundation of the world’ (Rev. 13:8b) was depicted, first by the Lord Himself when He gave Adam and Eve ‘skin for sin,’ and thereafter in the Old Testament sacrificial system (including Passover), which ended with the sacrifice of Christ on the cross.

As depicted by the application of water in covenant baptism, those belonging to Christ are said to have ‘put on Christ’ (Gal. 3:27), who ‘washed us from our sins in His own blood’ (Rev. 1:5b), by the ‘washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit, whom He poured out on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour…’ (Titus 3:5b&6).

After the first Adam ate the fruit forbidden from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in the midst of Paradise, he knew he was naked. He was expelled from the Garden. To those who have had the nakedness of their sin and shame covered, having put on Christ, the last Adam gives to eat of the tree of life, which is in the Paradise of God (Rev. 2:7; 22:14).

In the words of Augustus Toplady: Nothing in my hand I bring / simply to Thy cross I cling / naked, come to Thee for dress / helpless, look to Thee for grace / foul, I to the fountain fly / wash me Saviour, or I die.

Why not come to the Lamb of God to have your nakedness covered?

Saturday, December 15, 2018

CLOSETS & CHRISTIANS


Closets & Christians

It’s understandable that in times of persecution a Christian might possibly stay quiet about his beliefs. That aside, Christianity by nature needs to be expressed before others.  The true Christian has a life-transforming message backed up by a transformed life. Christianity is not a private religion. Therefore closet Christianity is a contradiction of terms.

However, this is not to say that the Christian is not to spend time in the closet. Jesus says to His disciples, “But you, when you pray, enter into your closet, and when you have shut your door, pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret shall reward you openly.” Matthew 6:6.

The word ‘closet’ or ‘room’ as used here is the same word for ‘storehouse’ elsewhere. A storehouse is a building in which goods are stored: a warehouse. Thus the Christian is to spend time in his heavenly Father’s storehouse talking to Him and asking Him for things. Therefore, as soon as the Christian opens his mouth to talk to His Father his little closet becomes a giant warehouse full of goods!

Is there anything that God is not able to supply? Jesus says, “If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask Him!” Matthew 7:11.

The Christian’s prayer closet is a room with a view. It is where time meets with eternity, the finite with the infinite. Thus the Christian’s closet is a box of paradox. The creature meeting the Creator is a speck of dust engaging the Omnipresent. God remains everywhere at once while He condescends to fully engage His spiritual child by wrapping His everlasting arms around him and lifting him up to hear what he has to say.

Prayer is an infant’s gurgling and lisping. And as a wide-eyed toddler in a massive toyshop the child of God excitedly asks for things he wants. But the only wise God gives us what we need. And as a doting parent showers its infant with kisses, so the heavenly Father showers His children with blessings. 

Jesus lists some of these blessings in the Beatitudes: “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted. Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be filled. Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.  Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God. Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God. Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” Matthew 5:2-10.

God confirms His covenanted blessings to the Christian when he enters his closet. But these are only some of the plethora of good gifts contained in God’s infinite storehouse. They are tokens of God’s saving grace.

God’s saving grace cannot be earned. It is a free gift provided by Jesus Christ. Enter your closet and seek God’s grace. But do so only in Jesus’ name. “Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” Acts 4:12. It’s just as Jesus says, “No one comes to the Father except through Me.” John 14:6b.

And when you exit the closet share the grace He has shown you with others. The Christian cannot remain in the closet. He is compelled to express God’s love by loving his neighbour as himself. Do this, and see if God won’t reward you openly.