EATING THE FORBIDDEN FRUIT
Westminster
Shorter Catechism 15
Quest. What
was the sin whereby our first parents fell from the estate wherein they were
created?
Ans. The sin whereby our first parents fell from the estate wherein they were created, was their eating of the forbidden fruit.
Introduction
| Image from Web |
Now, just
before we get into the thick of it, we need to state what we mean by God’s Law.
By the “Law of God” we mean God’s Law as summarized in the Ten Commandments.
Never lose sight of the fact that the Ten Commandments are simply a summary
of God’s Law. By definition, to give a summary is simply to give the substance
of a thing. A summary is an abridgement, a condensation, and a shortened
version of a thing. Therefore, the Ten Commandments are God’s Law in shorthand.
So, each of the Ten Commandments is in a sense a “headline” with a more
exhaustive story attached, which is to say that each of the Ten Commandments
needs to be unpackaged.
Each
commandment is a container in which God’s Law is enclosed. Or, to come at it
from a different angle, each one of the Ten Commandments has a specific
function while remaining inter-connected to the other nine, which is to say
that God’s Law applies to every area of our lives. But each of the Ten
Commandments addresses a specific area specifically. E.g., “You shall not
murder” applies to the sphere of physical wellbeing. Yet you can see how this
connects with the 4th Commandment in which God commands us to have
one day every seven as rest in Him.
Man needs
rest for his physical wellbeing. Or we can see how the commandment “You shall
not steal” applies to private property. God has declared one day in seven as
His Sabbath, i.e., day of rest. Therefore, we would, in a sense, be stealing
from God if we did not obey His commandment to rest on the day He has provided.
And if you work seven days a week for any length of time your own physical and
spiritual wellbeing will begin to suffer.
Anyway, I
don’t want us to get too bogged down in this at the moment. Suffice to say that
all Ten Commandments are interconnected each one with the other. This is on
account of the fact that the Decalogue is simply a summary of God’s Moral Law.
Sin then, is the breaking of this Moral Law.
This is going to help us understand what we’re looking at in the following.
The Tree
We need
to consider the tree that bore the forbidden fruit. The reason we need to do
this is because a tree figures so prominently at the centre of our first
parents’ sin. That tree is of course the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil.
Now,
there’s no question that the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was a
special tree. The history of this tree is that it was created on the third day
of creation week. “Then God said, ‘Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb
that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind,
whose seed is in itself, on the earth’, and it was so” (Gen. 1:11). So, the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil was like every other tree in that it
could reproduce itself. Part of its reproduction mechanism was its fruit, which
could be easily consumed by human beings, even Adam and Eve. So far so good.
Now, in
Genesis 2:8 we read, “The LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden, and there
He put the man whom He had formed.” So, possibly Adam got to watch the LORD God
plant the Garden of Eden. The idea seems to be that the LORD collected trees,
shrubs, plants and so forth from elsewhere, and made a special Garden –
a place of special delight. In other words, the trees didn’t just spring up at
God’s command as they did on the third day. Rather, they were transported and
transplanted to a corner of Eden – as was Adam himself.
And then we
read these words, “And out of the ground the LORD God made every tree grow that
is pleasant to the sight and good for food. The tree of life was in the midst
of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil” (Gen. 2:9). The
word “Eden” comes from a word meaning “delight”, “pleasant” or “pleasure”. And
we see that the trees of the Garden of Eden were pleasant to the eye. This
includes, of course, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
So, the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil wasn’t a grotesque or ugly looking tree.
In fact, we read in Genesis 3:6 that Eve found it “pleasant to the eyes.”
Therefore, the tree itself was a “good” tree, not a bad tree or an evil
tree. For at the end of the 6th day of creation didn’t God find
everything He had made pleasant to His sight when He declared it all “very
good”?
So, the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil had been planted by the LORD in the
midst of the Garden of Eden – along with, or beside, the tree of life. Therefore,
the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was a pleasant tree in a pleasant place.
But what makes the tree of the knowledge of good and evil such a special tree?
Did it have any special qualities inherent in it? Well, again it had an
aesthetic beauty. It was pleasant to the sight. But we’ve also seen that it was
good for food.
So, what
kind of tree was it? An apple tree? We still talk about an Adam’s apple when we
refer to a jutty-out bump in the throat of a man. I would imagine that this is
alluding to Adam swallowing the forbidden fruit and its getting stuck in his
throat. But, contrary to popular belief, the Bible doesn’t state that the tree
of the knowledge of good and evil was an apple tree.
However,
I should point out that the Bible does mention apple trees. E.g. metaphorically
in Song of Solomon 2:3, “Like an apple tree among the trees of the woods, so is
my beloved among the sons. I sat down in his shade with great delight, and his
fruit was sweet to my taste.” You can just about see Adam and Eve in that
verse. There they are sitting down in the shade of the tree of the knowledge of
good and evil among the trees of the Garden. “So when the woman saw that the
tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable
to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate. She also gave to her husband
with her, and he ate” (Gen. 3:6).
To be
sure, the Shulamite in the Song of Solomon is talking about her beloved and not
an actual apple tree or an actual apple. However, one might wonder if Solomon
had the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in mind when he penned the Song
of Solomon. But, even if he did, he would most likely have been referring to
that other tree in the midst of the garden, i.e. the tree of life.
| Image from Web |
Our first
parents sinned by eating the forbidden fruit. But all of this is just fanciful,
isn’t it? We don’t know what kind of tree the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil was. All we know for sure is that it was a fruit tree that was delightful
to the eye and good for food. So, other than that, there were no special
qualities to this tree. Its fruit didn’t contain poison, per se, although
the whole of humanity, including you and me, was ‘poisoned’ by the eating of
it.
To eat of
its fruit was sin. Why? Because God said so! Think about it, God had applied
His Moral Law to a fruit tree. He had told Adam that it was His own personal
private property. He, as it were, had said to Adam with regard to the tree of
the knowledge of good and evil, “You shall not steal.” But steal Adam did and
murdered himself and the whole of humanity with him in the process!
Our first parents coveted what was not theirs to have. They dishonoured God their Father. They were not pure and loyal. In other words, they did not love God and their neighbour (including you and me) as themselves. They proved this by eating the forbidden fruit.
The
Treason
Treason
is betrayal or breach of allegiance or of disobedience toward one’s sovereign
or government. When our first parents started eating the forbidden fruit, they
were breaking God’s Law, which is to say that they were breaching God’s
covenant. As the prophet Hosea says, “Adam transgressed the covenant” (Hos. 6:7).
So, Adam
exercised the free will he had before the Fall and committed treason by
choosing death over life. The outward test of Adam’s covenant obedience was
centred on the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. “And the LORD God
commanded the man, saying, ‘Of Every tree in the garden you may freely eat; but
of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day
that you eat of it you shall surely die’” (Gen. 2:16-17).
To
paraphrase a little, “Adam, if you want to show your allegiance to the
covenant, don’t eat the forbidden fruit. If you love Me keep My commandments.
But if you ever want to break this agreement, just eat of the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil. But remember that by doing so you will forfeit
eternal life and bliss and instead choose misery and death”.
So, our
first parents sinned by eating the forbidden fruit. They broke the whole of
God’s Law when they did so. For James says, “For whoever shall keep the whole
law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all” (James 2:10). So, when
Adam sinned, he was guilty of breaking the whole Law. Therefore, the breaking
of the Covenant of Works is the same as breaking the whole Law.Image from Web
So, what
on earth was Adam up to? Well, in Genesis 3:5 the serpent says, “For God knows
that in the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like
God, knowing good and evil.” So, just as Satan wanted to be like God by
exalting himself, so Adam also elevated himself above the Law of God.
But this
is treason against the sovereign Lawgiver; the LORD God Himself! The sin was in
the fact that God had commanded Adam not to eat the fruit. If God had not
commanded or forbidden it, it wouldn’t be a sin, would it? Therefore, it is God
alone who declares what is sin and what is not sin.
So, we
see then that our first parents sinned by eating the forbidden fruit, not
because of anything in the fruit or the tree itself, but rather because they
disobeyed a direct command of God. God’s Word is Law and is therefore to be
heeded and obeyed! So, our first parents rebelled against their
Sovereign when they disobeyed Him. They also aspired to a higher state, namely,
to be like God, i.e. as a Lawgiver. Our first parents wanted to set up their
own kingdom in which they were the sovereign rulers, where they would make up
their own rules about what is right and what is wrong, good and evil.
We see
this kind of megalomaniacal desire acted out by the likes of Adolf Hitler. His
desire, I believe, was simply an intense twisting and sinful warping of the
Cultural Mandate to subdue the earth. But God alone created all things from
nothing by His creative fiat. And fallen Man attempts to do likewise in various
unlawful ways. E.g. he prints paper money without any real money, i.e. gold to
back it. He refers to this paper money as if it were the real money itself!
What was
the paper money issued by the Confederate States of America worth when their
side lost the Civil War? It wasn’t worth the paper it was printed on because
there was nothing to back it! Only God can create something from nothing. Man
can’t. It’s all alchemy, isn’t it? At least in the Middle Ages fallen Man tried
to make gold from lead. But nowadays they try to make gold out of paper. Alchemy
gone awry! It is all part of, and a continuation of, our first parents
treacherous and treasonous conspiring with God’s enemy the Devil against
God.
The Devil
was there, wasn’t he? He’s usually depicted as coiled around the tree of the
knowledge of good and evil. He is a constrictor. He put the squeeze on Adam and
Eve to join him in rebellion against God. But he did so by painting God as a
constrictor! “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree in the
garden’?” “What do you mean that you cannot eat of every tree? How narrow,
how restrictive! Why don’t you just ignore God’s Law and become a law unto
yourselves? Why don’t you forget about God’s Law and just write your own?” And
isn’t this where we’re at today in the Western World, even the whole world
today? We can be thankful that God’s Law was written into Western Constitutions
such as ours (in Australia). But you can see that today we are becoming more
and more law-makers and less and less law-appliers.Image from Web
God’s Law
is less and less being applied in the courts of law today. E.g. adultery and
homosexuality used to be crimes. But this is no longer the case. Even lying is
now being referred to as the less precise terms of ‘spin-doctoring, ‘gaslighting’.
But not only did God sovereignly create the universe from nothing, but He also
has sovereign providential control over all creatures and their actions.
Fallen
Man seeks to be like God by passing laws left right and centre to govern every
creature and its actions. If you don’t believe me, just look at tax-law and
traffic and city parking laws as a couple of examples. Look at all the
political correctness laws that are now cluttering up the law books! To be sure
a lot of these laws are designed to help, but these laws are legion! And yet
Mankind has the audacity to call the Ten Commandments too constricting!
But all
of this just goes to prove that what the Apostle Paul says is true. “Therefore,
just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus
death spread to all men, because all sinned” (Rom. 5:12). All broke the
Covenant of Works. All broke the eternal Moral Law. So, this means that when
Adam sinned we all sinned. Or as the prophet Hosea says, “Like Adam they
transgressed the covenant” (Hos. 6:7). Which covenant did Adam
transgress? The Covenant of Works. Therefore, by our first parents eating the
forbidden fruit, all humanity became covenant breakers, setting themselves up
as the new lawmaker and giver.
In Romans
1:31 the Apostle Paul speaks of fallen man as “covenant breakers.” You’ll need
to look in the King James Version to find those exact words. The New King James
Version has the word “untrustworthy” instead of “covenant breakers.” The New
International Version renders it “faithless”. But whether you use the words
“untrustworthy”, “faithless”, “perfidious”, “treacherous” it all begs the
question: with regard to what is fallen Man untrustworthy, faithless etc.? The
general answer is of course “God”. But the Greek word used in Romans 1:31
speaks of a pact, an agreement – a covenant! The Greek word is best translated
“covenant breakers” as in the King James Version. Therefore, fallen Man is
untrustworthy, faithless with regard to God’s covenant.
“And even
as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a
reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; being filled with
all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full
of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, backbiters, haters of
God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to
parents, without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural
affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they
which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have
pleasure in them that do them” (Rom. 1:28-32 KJV).
To break that covenant was to break God’s eternal Moral Law.
Conclusion
If sin is
the breaking of God’s Moral Law, and if all Mankind became covenant breakers on
account of our first parents eating the forbidden fruit, then we have to
conclude that eating the forbidden fruit involved much, much more than breaking
one single command of God. We have to conclude that in Adam the entire human
race broke the entire Moral Law when he ate of the tree of the knowledge of
good and evil, which is to say that Man’s treason infiltrates every sphere of
life to which the Ten Commandments may be applied. Which is to say that Fallen
Man is at war with God in regards other gods, graven images, taking the Lord’s
name in vain, the Sabbath, honouring father and mother, murder, adultery,
stealing, lying, and coveting – all Ten Commandments.
In a
word, fallen Man is at war with the Moral character of God. For the Moral Law
is the outward expression of the inward Moral character of God. The Moral Law
is the revelation of who and what God is. Therefore, when our first parents
sinned by eating the forbidden fruit, they didn’t just steal an apple and eat
it – big deal! They actually rebelled against everything that makes God God!
They broke God’s everlasting covenant that was being administered by God to Man
at that time in the form of the Covenant of Works. So, we see then that our
first parent did not like that covenant arrangement and declared their mind on
this matter by eating the forbidden fruit. Therefore, an act of outright
treason toward God took place right under the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil.
But God
is full of grace and mercy. The eating of the forbidden fruit wasn’t the end of
Mankind. For, our first parents drew blood when they bit into that forbidden
fruit, when they bit the hand that fed them. They drew the blood of God’s
everlasting covenant. That blood – the blood of Christ’s cross – is the blood
that washes away all our sin. Make sure that His shed blood has washed away
your sins. Repent and believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ.
We’ve
looked at the question: What was the sin whereby our first parents fell from
the estate wherein they were created? And we’ve considered something of the
answer: The sin whereby our first parents fell from the estate wherein they
were created, was their eating of the forbidden fruit.
No comments:
Post a Comment