This is a well-structured book
which sets out to ask and answer a series of ten questions regarding freedom, where
it comes from, what it means to you, how to sustain it, etc. It is
well-written, well-reasoned, and well-presented albeit in academic fashion. However,
this is no dry and dusty treatise. It is a call to identify and resolve America’s
declension and deterioration under aggressive Progressivism.
Guinness points to the source
of the toxic seeds of destruction: “For 1776 [American
Revolution] and its heirs the focus was on truth, whereas for 1789 [French
Revolution] its focus was on power. The former stresses inner freedom as well
as outer freedom, and both negative and positive freedom, whereas 1789 stresses
outer freedom over inner freedom, and negative freedom at the expense of
positive freedom. For 1776, freedom is viewed as personal freedom from
government control, whereas 1789 views freedom as progressive freedom through
government control. The former is realistic about the potential for the abuse of power, and therefore takes “under God” seriously, whereas 1789 is
utopian about human nature, and has no final accountability.” p. 90.
The main thesis of the book is
about the initial establishment of American freedom, i.e., freedom through
covenant: “The impact of the covenant and the notion of covenantalism can be seen in three periods of history. First, and most obviously, the Sinai
covenant constituted the Jewish people and formed the Jewish nation… Second,
the precedent and pattern of the Sinai covenant was rediscovered and developed
by the Reformation. Along with the truths of calling and conscience, it became
one of the three most decisive gifts of the Reformation that shaped the rise of
the modern world. Switzerland, the Netherlands, Scotland, England, and the
United States – each was powerfully shaped by the Reformation and in turn
helped to shape the modern world … The third period of influence is the most
recent … The US Constitution, which has been the pacesetter document for so
many other countries and constitutions, is in essence a form of national and
somewhat secularized covenant and a notion that goes back to Mount Sinai.” pgs.
35-37.
Guinness optimistically believes
America can recapture her rapidly evaporating freedom: “As with other
covenantal societies, the truth is that the United States goes forward best by
going back first. It must return to its roots in constitutional or covenantal
freedom, renewing the ideals that made it possible, and righting the wrongs
where America has betrayed its founding promise. By recovenanting and going
back first, the United States is in fact able to go forward.” p. 280.
Last Call for Liberty is worth
taking the time to read, though this reviewer was left a bit confused with
Guinness’s Arminian, and somewhat Dispensational theology. Guinness holds the
view that God waits for sinners to take the initiative in their own salvation,
and Guinness equates Old Testament believers with anti-Trinitarian Judaism.
However, these views don’t seem to overly affect the main thesis of his book. But it will affect his understanding of God’s Covenant and its various administrations
(including Sinai) throughout Scripture.
No comments:
Post a Comment