Mind Over Matter
Today’s Darwinian Evolutionists, because they have
taken Darwin’s Theory to its logical conclusion, have had to adopt an Atheist
position. However, for Charles Darwin (1809-92), and his forerunner
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829), the problem of the origin of mind, though
irreconcilable to their respective theories of Evolution, was somewhat mitigated
by their belief in God as the First Cause. Regarding Lamarck and Darwin, wrote
Charles Hodge in 1872:
Maid of the Loch, Loch Lomond |
God, says
Lamarck, created matter; God, says Darwin, created the unintelligent living
cell; both say that, after that first step, all else follows by natural law,
without purpose and without design. No man can believe this, who cannot also
believe that all the works of art, literature, and science in the world are the
products of carbonic acid, water, and ammonia.[29]
In the
penultimate sentence of his following summary Hodge makes the further point
that Darwin’s theory assumes an impossibility. Says Hodge:
Mr.
Charles Darwin... accounts for the origin of all the varieties of plants and
animals by the gradual operation of natural causes. In his work on the Origin
of Species, he says... all animals and plants are descended from some one
prototype....
Darwin refers
the origin of species mainly to the laws of nature operating ab extra –
killing off the weak or less perfect, and preserving the stronger or more
perfect.... Darwin holds that they [new species] arise by a slow process of
very minute changes....
It shocks
the common sense of unsophisticated men to be told that the whale and the
hummingbird, man and the mosquito, are derived from the same source... The
theory in question cannot be true, because it is founded on the assumption of
an impossibility. It assumes that matter does the work of mind....[30]
Thus, it is the opinion of Hodge that the
Materialist confuses mind with matter. But, what is mind? Where is it from?
First off, mind and brain must not be confused as synonymous terms (e.g., as
does the Materialist). For the mind is more than a series of random
thought-producing sequential electro-chemical-impulses firing off in the grey
matter! Properly understood, the brain with its electrical impulses or
chemical-exchanges only accommodates thought. It does not originate
thinking. This is because production is not the same as origination. Whereas
production simply describes a process of replication, origination points to its
creator – it points to its originator.
In the final analysis, to replicate anything there
first needs be an original to copy. Thus biological life is able to accommodate
biological functions – such as human thinking – only because there exists
beforehand a thinking being able to originate and then sustain that biological
life. We refer to the eternal Triune God of the Bible as that original thinking
Being who is able to originate. Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) while doing
scientific research said that he was ‘thinking God’s thoughts after Him.’
Simply put: as creatures of His creation we are to think God’s thoughts after
Him.
Since God thinks, and is Spirit (without a body or
parts), a mind doesn’t necessarily need matter (such as a brain) to think. E.g.,
created angelic beings have no bodies, but are able to think rationally. The
disembodied spirits of men in the present intermediate states of Heaven and
Hell are also able to think. Thus at the back of all thinking is the great
originator of thinking, the Triune God of Christianity. Thus rational man – in
thinking God’s thoughts after Him – is merely replicating or (re)producing that
which originated in the very mind of God.
We see something of God’s general upkeep of His
creation expressed by the Psalmist who, thinking God’s thoughts after Him, says
of God: ‘He causes the grass to grow for the cattle, and vegetation for the
service of man, that he may bring forth food from the earth’ Psalm 104:14. Also
thinking God’s thoughts after Him, the Prophet Isaiah writes, ‘As a beast goes
down into the valley, and the Spirit of God causes him to rest, so You lead
Your people to make Yourself a glorious name’ Isaiah 63:14. Therefore, God (who
is Spirit) by His Spirit acts upon matter – causing grass to grow and animals
to rest. Thus we are reflecting God on a creaturely level when we too act upon
matter (i.e., when our immaterial minds work with and through our material
bodies).
Paul Garbett is helpful in the area of mind and
brain where he says,
Whilst our brains process
information received from the world, it is the mind that chooses what to
do with that information. Whilst the mind uses the brain as a processing unit,
the mind is more than just a brain. This is, in fact, a provable hypothesis:
Scientists have discovered that it is possible to electrically stimulate part of
the brain to cause the involuntary movement of an arm, for example. When
the patient was asked to control the arm, they struggle to hold it still using
their other arm. This demonstrates that whilst one arm was under the control of
the electrically stimulated brain, the other was under the control of
the mind. Thus, this experiment demonstrates that the mind is something
in addition to the physical brain. The best explanation for this, and a host of
other human functions already mentioned, is that a person is an immaterial
being that inhabits a physical body (including the brain) – as the Bible
suggests. The interaction between material brain and this immaterial soul is
what we understand the ‘mind’ to be. It is where our true self engages with the
world we perceive through the senses.[31]
Though the reflection of God can be seen in the
Biblical revelation of angels and, to a lesser extent, can be seen in animals,
man alone is the image of God. And, since that image became distorted by the
fall of man, our thinking also replicates or produces the corruption that
originated with Adam disobeying God by eating the fruit forbidden him by God.
God cursed the ground when Adam sinned against Him. Man is subject to futility
and frustration due to his bondage to corruption and decay. Thus things go
wrong. And as our thinking has, through our sin, become disconnected from God (who
is Creator, Sustainer, and Redeemer of man, and, by extension, creation), so
too our minds have become somewhat out of sync with our bodies. We have to
train hard to get our bodies to perform to the peak of their ability. The peak
of fitness is invariably frustrated through disease, injury and/or old
age.
The disconnection of mind and body is fully
realised at the point of physical death. Before that we may experience anything
from full paralysis of the body to the less severe loss of one or more of our
senses. In both of these physical conditions the mind fails to receive from the
body data required to function properly and in turn the body with its senses
fails to execute the tasks ordered by the mind.
Says Dutch Calvinist Herman Bavinck (1854-1921),
Though
human persons are not merely physical beings, all their activities are bound to
the body and dependent on it, not just the vegetative and animal functions, but
also the intellectual ones of thinking and willing. Although our brains are not
the cause of our higher faculties of knowing and desiring, they are
nevertheless the bearer and organ of these faculties. Every malfunction in the
brain results in the abnormal functioning of the rational mind.[32]
Arguably the greatest of American theologians, the
Calvinist Jonathan Edwards in the 18th century made the following
comment about the union of the mind with the body,
The mind
is so united to the body, that an alteration is caused in the body, it is
probable, by every action of the mind. By those acts that are very vigorous, a
great alteration is very sensible; at some times, when the vigour of the body
is impaired by disease, especially in the head, almost every action causes a
sensible alteration of the body.[33]
In his fallen state man is prone also to all sorts
of mental disorders. However, just as God causes the grass to grow and the
beasts to rest in the valley, so God also can cause madness in human beings for
His own purpose – as the mighty king Nebuchadnezzar learnt: ‘This is the decree
of the Most High, which has come upon my lord the king, they shall drive you
from men, your dwelling shall be with the beasts of the field, and they shall
make you eat grass like oxen. They shall wet you with the dew of heaven, and
seven times shall pass over you, till you know that the Most High rules in the
kingdom of men, and gives it to whoever He chooses’ Daniel 4:24&25.
We see that God, by His Spirit, is active in His
creation, causing even the grass to grow, moving the beasts of the field, and
directing the thoughts of fallen men – even in their madness. Of course, the
Materialist would deny all of this! He would deny that the Most High, with His
Supreme Mind, is behind all thought-processes of angel, man, and beast. Thus by
denying the mind and by restricting his study only to matter the Materialist
leaves himself unable to explain the origin of thought, whether that thought is
rational or other.
Hodge again points at the heart of Materialism’s
problem:
Materialism
is that system which ignores the distinction between matter and mind, and
refers all the phenomena of the world, whether physical, vital, or mental, to
the functions of matter.[34]
Materialism is extremist in that it denies spirit, and is the antithesis of
Idealism. Says Francis Nigel Lee,
Materialistic
philosophy presupposes that the universe is basically matter, and idealistic
philosophy presupposes that the universe is basically spirit. Each of these
philosophical isms or heresies precludes the other and attempts to give
a complete account of the universe in terms of its own basic presuppositions.
It is obvious that the Bible is opposed to both materialism and idealism.[35]
Excerpted from my book The Nexus: The True Nature of Nature.
Available in eBook or paperback at Amazon:
https://tinyurl.com/y96ebokc
Excerpted from my book The Nexus: The True Nature of Nature.
Available in eBook or paperback at Amazon:
https://tinyurl.com/y96ebokc
Well written Neil. Might read this for the next revision of FITS.
ReplyDelete