Tuesday, February 25, 2025

WHY I'M NOT AN ATHEIST

 Preface

My father and mother were Marxists like their parents before them. The area where I grew up (Alexandria, Dunbartonshire) even had streets named after Marxists (such as Engels Street, named after Frederick Engels, who with Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto). I started my working life in the early 70s in a shipyard on the “Red Clydeside” (i.e., “red” as in a Socialist/Communist area of) Glasgow.

It was during my study of the teachings of Marx that I discovered that he had no answer to the question regarding the origin of humanity. It seemed to me that if he was successfully to influence (manipulate?) the minds of men and women to his way of thinking (i.e., to think his thoughts after him) then he needed to base his model of social engineering on something more solid than the vague musings of Charles Darwin. Marxist Socialism is Social Darwinism. You cannot have one without the other. The World Socialist Website writes,


The two great historical theories of the 19th century, of Darwin and Marx … have fundamentally changed our understanding of the world. They were part of the development of science in its broadest form – the desire to comprehend the natural and social worlds in order to change them for the benefit of mankind.[1]

If Darwin got it wrong then that which is based upon Darwinism must be wrong. From the tearing down of the Berlin Wall to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Socialism has been proven to be wrong. Examples of this truth could be multiplied. Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, and China garner no envy from those who love the freedoms we (used to) enjoy in the various Western democracies. Hitler’s form of government, like today’s China, was National Socialism. However, we are now not permitted by the Politically Correct Movement to connect Hitler with Socialism!!!, (nor the Ku Klux Klan for that matter). Hitler and KKK are portrayed as right-wing by the Social-Engineers of the “Department of Revisionist History”. Join in the fun and do a scientific social experiment: Ask your friends if Hitler (and the Ku Klux Klan) were Leftist.

It matters not to me whether Hitler or Ku Klux Klan members[2] or any other Socialists are called “far right” (Wikipedia) or even “far left”. What worries me is that these were violent Progressives. Socialism gave birth to Progressivism in which the umbilical cord is still very much attached!

In the West we have reached a point in history where our freedoms as law-abiding individuals are shrinking at an alarming rate as governments apply the Socialist theory of Political Correctness to attain their utopian classless society. Freedom of Speech is curtailed. Sodomy and buggery are accommodated, endorsed and even promoted by the State redefining marriage. This is Socialism socially engineering mankind in its own image and likeness. Progressives, whether Left or Right, remain Socialistic regardless of their political parties by virtue of their desire to have government redistribute the wealth of the individual in order to attain their vision for society. Adolf Hitler was as much a Socialist as was Stalin. In Socialism all must agree with the collective vision or be ostracised, demonised, imprisoned and… (take, for example, the carnage of the French Revolution). This is not God’s way, which is, in my humble opinion, a far better way.

It became clear to me through my studies of Marx and Marxism that he did not believe in the God of Scripture. Otherwise he would not have come up with his social theories. Marx was a Materialist like Hegel before him. Dialectical Materialism. Thus, I put down my copy of “The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists” (Robert Tressell) and picked up a copy of the Bible, the true inspiration for any philanthropic endeavour. Therein I discovered a better way, a better way to love my neighbour as myself.

What Socialism pretends to be, Biblical Christianity really is! Biblical Christianity is the reality of a caring society, a society in which justice is blind. First off, Christianity answers the question of origins, i.e., the: Who we are as individuals and What we are supposed to be as a society. And secondly, unlike Socialism which has been proven to fail over and over, Biblical Christianity really works when put into practice, e.g., democratic government, the rule of law, justice for all, individual rights (in line with the rule of law), Capitalism, schools, hospitals, public sanitation, the abolition of slavery, etc., etc., etc. One only has to study what John Calvin did for Geneva with Biblical Christianity to see how the teachings of the Bible apply to society.

In the (Biblical) Westminster system of government and public meetings there are those who speak for a motion (i.e., an issue) and those who speak against it. A moderator (or referee) ensures that the issue is sufficiently discussed before it is put to a vote. This is democracy! However, Socialism seeks to silence all dissenters from its collective Socialist thought. Thus, today’s Political Correctness Movement. In this the very foundations of the West presently are being destroyed by Socialism in its various forms. Socialism is Atheistic. Because it is rooted in the Atheism of Marx et al, Socialism is a blight on the fruit of Western freedom.


It is when a people forget God, that tyrants forge their chains.[3]

That “The pen is mightier than the sword” may be true, but some would use that mighty instrument to write vitriolic ad-hominem arguments instead of speaking directly to the issue at hand. I have no personal axe-to-grind with anyone. I desire only to state my own personal hang-ups with Atheism as a contemporary movement. Readers are free to agree/disagree with my take on it. However, please allow me freedom of thought and the freedom to express that thought in written form.

There is life after Marx. I am not an Atheist because of the grace of God. My father and mother also became Christians after Marx. Yes, it is hard to be a consistently Biblical Christian, especially for those having been previously heavily influenced by Socialism, and with so much of it permeating the society in which we currently live. Therefore, as Christians we need to keep on “looking unto Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith” Hebrews 12:2a.

It is with the following gracious teaching of Jesus in mind that I have written my little book called, “Why I am Not an Atheist”. Note the profound depth of grace contained in what Jesus says,


When His disciples James and John saw [that people were not receiving and believing in Jesus] they said, ‘Lord, do You want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them, just as Elijah did?’ But He turned and rebuked them, and said, ‘You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men’s lives but to save them.’ And they went to another village.[4]

May my manner herein and hereafter be of the Spirit of Christ! 



[2] To be sure, a Democrat does not necessarily a (full blown) Socialist make. However, the point is that Democrats are Progressives, which, whether Left or the Right, is Socialistic. It is Socialism by another name.

“Most prominent in counties where the races were relatively balanced, the KKK engaged in terrorist raids against African Americans and white Republicans at night, employing intimidation, destruction of property, assault, and murder to achieve its aims and influence upcoming elections. In a few Southern states, Republicans organized militia units to break up the Klan.” - http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/kkk-founded

[3] Patrick Henry

[4] Luke 9:54-56, New King James Version.

Monday, February 24, 2025

THE APOSTLES' CREED

 

THE APOSTLES’ CREED 

I believe in God the Father Almighty,

Maker of heaven and earth;

and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord,

which was conceived by the Holy Ghost,

Born of the Virgin Mary,

suffered under Pontius Pilate,

was crucified, dead, and buried;

He descended into hell;

the third day He arose again from the dead;

He ascended into heaven,

and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty;

from thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead.

I believe in the Holy Ghost;

the holy catholic church;

the communion of saints;

the forgiveness of sins;

the resurrection of the body;

 and the life everlasting. Amen.

The word ‘Creed’ comes from the Latin ‘credo’ which simply means ‘I believe.’ All words have meanings and histories. Like everything else, as far as words are concerned, context is most important. Therefore, the words of the Apostles’ Creed ought to be read in their proper context.

The historical context is not that the Apostles’ formulated this creed, but rather that the early Church Fathers formulated it in accordance with the teaching of the Apostles as recorded in Scripture. Therefore, the Apostles’ Creed is a brief statement of what the Bible says about God, Christ, the redemption He provided, and redemption’s access and application.


The Apostles’ Creed or Symbolum Apostolicum, is, as to its form, not the production of the Apostles, as was formerly believed, but an admirable popular summary of the Apostolic teaching, and in full harmony with the spirit and even the letter of the New Testament.[1]

Christianity is not subjective, but rather is objective. Christianity is based on truth, propositional truth, communicated by God through men and recorded in Scripture (i.e., the sixty-six books of the Holy Bible). Unlike Materialist belief-systems (e.g. neo-Darwinism), beginning with God, Christianity is solidly scientific.


To believe in something is to hold to the truthfulness of the object in which one believes. Therefore, those subscribing to the Apostles’ Creed are stating that the object of their belief is the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit – i.e., the three Persons who are one God, His actions, the redemption He has provided, what this means and to whom it applies. All of this is according to God’s Word, the Scriptures.

Christianity therefore is based on objective truth. Whereas the Atheistic presupposition is that the Father Almighty is not the Maker of heaven and earth, Christianity's touchstone is the presupposition that the sixty-six books of the Bible is the Father Almighty’s (written) revelation to fallen man.

 

The Apostles’ Creed … sums up in a few words the main points of our redemption, and thus may serve as a tablet for us upon which we see distinctly and point by point the things in Christ that we ought to heed … The whole history of our faith is summed up in it succinctly and in definite order, and it … contains nothing that is not vouched for by genuine testimonies of Scripture.[2]     

The external object of the Christian system of belief is the Triune God as revealed in Scripture, and His plan and execution of redemption revealed from Genesis to Revelation. Therefore, the Bible is redemptive-historical and God’s revelation therein is progressive.

Generally speaking, the Old Testament predicts Christ’s work of redemption. The Gospels record the events of Christ’s redemption. The Epistles explain what it all means and how we ought to live in light of redemption. The final book of the Bible, the Book of Revelation, by much use of symbols, illustrates the success of Christ’s work of redemption and the certainty of the (future) new heavens and the new earth, in which all sin, evil and its effects are banished, and in which only righteousness dwells. The renewed earth is the Heaven in which the redeemed and resurrected will live forever with Christ. Those not redeemed will be resurrected but will be in hellish-torment forever. ‘Those who believe do not come into judgment (John 5:24); those who do not believe are already condemned and remain under God’s wrath (John 3:18, 36).’[3] 

Though brief descriptions of the Father and the Son are given in the Creed, the Holy Spirit is mentioned without detail. The Heidelberg Catechism dealing with articles of The Apostles’ Creed, under the heading “The Holy Trinity Lord’s Day 24” says,

24. How are these articles divided?

Into three parts: the first is of God the Father and our creation; the second, of God the Son and our redemption; the third of God the Holy Spirit and our sanctification. (1 Peter 1:2)

The object aimed at in the Apostles’ Creed is to state belief in:

a) The Triune God – as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

b) The Father – as Maker of Heaven and Earth.

c) The Son – as Redeemer, bringing redemption as Jesus Christ:

i. God’s only Son our Lord Jesus Christ.

ii. His conception by the work of the Holy Spirit.

iii. His being born of the Virgin Mary.

iv. His suffering under Pontius Pilate.

v. His being crucified, dead, and buried.

vi. His descending into Hell.

vii. His rising from the dead the third day.

viii. His ascendance into Heaven.

ix. His reigning with God in Heaven.

x. His coming from Heaven to judge the living and the dead.

d) The Holy Spirit.

e) The Holy Catholic Church.

f) The Communion of Saints.

g) The Forgiveness of Sins.

h) The Resurrection of the Body.

i) The Life Everlasting.

Available at Amazon near you: I BELIEVE! The Apostles' Creed : McKinlay, Neil Cullan: Amazon.com.au: Books

[1] Philip Schaff, The Creeds of Christendom, Volume 1, Baker Book House, Reprinted 1996, 14.

[2] John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book 2:16:18, Battles Translation, Westminster Press, 1960.

[3] Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics – Holy Spirit, Church, and New Creation, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2008, 700.

Saturday, February 22, 2025

COFFEE ANYONE?

 

COFFEE ANYONE?

(Excerpted from Jefferson’s Tears, pgs. 56-59)


Another couple of soldiers had drawn near to listen to the conversation. One of them said, “I never knew the Bible had all this interesting stuff in it!” 

“Neither did I,” replied the chaplain. “Neither did I until I started reading it in my early thirties and got converted.”

“Padre, can you get me one of those camouflage Bibles?” said one soldier.

“Me too?” said another. “I’d be glad to,” responded the chaplain as he took another sip of his coffee. He looked at his watch. He had a meeting to attend soon, so he was of two minds whether to introduce the new subject. But, because he was enjoying the present company, he went for it.

“We all like coffee, right?”

The other three men nodded in agreement.

“Well, in the spirit of entrepreneurialism, or you could say that here’s a Scotsman on the make, I’d like to pour out for you a cupful, nay, an overflowing mugful of aromatic success. It really is time for you guys to wake up and smell the coffee! Yeah, yeah, it may be true that coffee always smells better than it tastes. However, money never disappoints.” The chaplain was talking tongue in cheek while at the same time being half serious. His audience was all ears, even if a little bewildered. So he went on. “What’s my bottom line? Friends, people are willing to pay up to $80 for a cup of something found in soiled kitty litter. I kid you not. ‘Kopi luwak’ is the seeds of coffee berries that have been eaten and then defecated by the Asian palm civet. A civet is a cat-like beastie, a toddy-cat that you find in places like Sumatra, Bali, and the Philippines. Civet coffee comes from cat poo — well, the beans come from cat poo!”

Each of the men, including the chaplain, instinctively looked into his coffee cup. All except Jefferson screwed up their faces as they contemplated the process for making civet coffee.

“Are you getting a whiff of where we can go with this?” continued the chaplain. “Think about it. If coffee beans that have been passed through a cat’s digestive system can entice people to part with ultra-bucks for a cup of joe, then so will the same beans passed through a more attractive animal — such as a koala or a kangaroo, or maybe a bird such as the kookaburra or a cassowary.”

The chaplain could see that the others were enjoying his little sales pitch. They sat there wondering how to get a kangaroo or a koala to eat coffee beans.

“Now here’s the rub: There was a coffee expert who did a comparison between the same beans, some of which had passed through the intestines of the cat-like critter and some that hadn’t. He said that clearly the luwak coffee sold for its story, and not for the superior quality of coffee. He said the cat-poo coffee tasted stale and lifeless, something like soggy petrified dinosaur dung. I don’t know how he knows what petrified dinosaur doo-doos taste like. Anyway, it is more than clear that people buy this kind of coffee more for the novelty than the taste.” The chaplain drained his coffee cup as he gave his audience time to digest his words, then he went on, “Did you get that? It’s not about the actual taste. It’s about the story, the novelty. Oh, pennies from heaven! It’s raining gold doubloons! Your (coffee) cup runneth over! Are you hearing the ringing of tills? Kerching. Are you smelling the sweet smell of financial success? Try saying it slowly with meaning, Kangaroo Coffee, Koala Coffee, Kookaburra Coffee, Cassowary Coffee!”

“How about Crocodile Coffee?” added one of the others.

“Bottom line?” asked the chaplain. “The bottom line is that we can make big bucks by using Australian iconic birds and animals to help us sell coffee to the coffee-craving crowd. For the quality is more in the story than the coffee bean. Think about it: novelty needs no salesman.”

“Everyone would be happy. Animal lovers? Help us save the endangered koala and cassowary! Job hunters? Come work in our coffee plantation/animal farm! Coffee lovers? Would you like to step into the Outback? Smell the desert breeze? Bound across the plains? Climb a gum tree? Laugh among the treetops? Run through the bush? Then drink a cup of Australia!

“Good idea or what? Something to think about over your next cup of coffee? Let me know. And just remember that I thought of it first!”

At that he thanked Jefferson for the coffee and excused himself, saying that he’d return and continue the conversation some other time. The others looked at each other as if they were wondering what had just happened. They weren’t sure whether to laugh or to start making plans to start an exotic coffee business.

The chaplain chuckled to himself as he walked away. He had had a bit of fun. However, he had not gotten very far when he had to run for cover. The “War Games” had suddenly come to the camp and the rat-a-tat-tat of blank ammunition could be heard as the defenders defended the little camp against the attackers. And it was getting closer …

Friday, February 14, 2025

VISHAL MANGALWADI (A Couple of Interesting Videos)

The following are a few of my scribblings upon watching the Vishal Mangalwadi interview by Douglas Wilson. It’s best you watch the video for yourself, because my own interactions are interspersed among some of Dr Mangalwadi’s comments, so much so, that we wouldn’t wish him to get the blame for something I said. He provokes thought and I tend to think out loud.

Vishal mentioned that it was poetry, along with the Bible, that changed India. He mentioned Psalms 102 and 137 in particular (which, among other things, shows OT Israel’s attachment to land). He spoke of the English poets, mentioning Wordsworth and Longfellow. Longfellow is, of course, American. Therefore, is Vishal perhaps using the term English to refer to English speakers/writers as opposed to Englishmen? There is English Canada and there is French Canada. And, annoying as it is to Scots, Americans often refer to Great Britain as England. Here in Australia, I have been asked if I can do a British accent. Upon investigation I discovered that a British accent is more like an Etonian accent. Therefore, Scots and Scousers need not apply.

It is interesting that the word poet has to do with creating and making according to its Greek etymology. The word ποιητής originates from verb ποιώ (which means create). So, the Greek word for poet has to do with being a creator. God is the Creator who spoke creation into being. We are made in His image and likeness. Poets reflect Him in creating poems. (We are fallen, therefore, we are not always the best reflectors.) Wordsworth and Longfellow were Anglos in the sense that they wrote in English. Longfellow said, “All that I have is the Lord’s; not mine to give or withhold it; His, not mine, are the gifts, and only so far as I can make them mine, as in giving I add my heart to whatever is given.” “Glorious indeed is the world of God around us, but more glorious the world of God within us, there lies the land of song; there lies the poet’s native land.” The Psalms are inspired poetry. They speak of God. Wordsworth and Longfellow, though uninspired, spoke of God too. 

Vishal says that India had no concept of nationalism, until an Indian Hindu convert to Christianity began writing poetry. He was ‘inspired’ by the ‘English’ poets. Nationalism has ties to the land. It is a Jewish (OT) concept. Vishal maintains that Longfellow, Wordsworth etc. inspired Indian poets. Out of that came Indian nationalism, the concept of a nation. This came from reading English poetry and reading the Bible.

NT Greek did not have a word for nation. This has been misunderstood by American theologians and missiologists. “Go into all the world and disciple all nations (ethnoi)…” does not mean disciple people groups per se. Vishal says that though it is true that the Greeks did not have a word for nation, the (NT) Greek word needs to have the Hebrew (OT) theology poured into it to have its intended Biblical meaning, i.e., make nations great again. Vishal said that President Trump understands the meaning of the word nation much better than American missiologists do.

My own thought: Will we begin to see prayer return to the state schools and the Ten Commandments to the court buildings now that President Trump wants to give God back His rightful place, as rehearsed in the words in the pledge of allegiance “one nation under God”?

Vishal says that the idea of nation was a Jewish-Protestant idea, not Roman Catholic or Orthodox. Nation was God’s idea for peace. The Netherlands and Switzerland first and second (OT Jewish-Protestant) nations. America was third. Interestingly, there were thirteen tribes of Israel (Joseph had two sons), and America had thirteen states (or colonies). Just as the Christian Church was in the thirteen states, so the Levites were everywhere. They were the glue that held OT Israel together.

An empire is about conquest, which is bad. Imperialism is evil. According to the Bible, a great nation is something different to a mere nation. A great nation is defined as that which holds to God’s justice and law. The further any nation moves away from this, the less great it becomes.

The apostle Thomas went to India because there already was a Jewish community already there. Therefore, God had His witness in India.

American Christianity foolishly handed over education to the state. Therefore, a new encyclopedia cum university is needed. Free to everyone, K through 12. Using AI technology to bring to life Shakespeare to teach his own plays, Einstein to teach his own theories, Newton etc. (makes me think that this may be a precursor for something like Star Trek: The Next Generation’s “Holodeck”, where participants enter into the Globe Theatre or Einstein’s classroom to learn firsthand!) The world’s best curriculum, would be given away for free to home schoolers, filling the earth with the knowledge of God as the waters cover the sea. College level too, with BAs etc. offered. Editorial control would be by Christian scholars. A way to pay for it all has been anticipated. Now that the anti-Christian neo-Marxism is on the wane, the four-years Trump window of opportunity must not be squandered by Christians.

Post-DL Moody American Christianity is a defeated religion. It’s a theology in the silos. Instead of teaching all aspects of Christianity holos-bolos in universities, it now seeks only to win souls, hold little Prayer Groups and Bible Studies.  Vishal says that Billy Graham won tons of souls and lost America. The next four years can be a season for winning America back. The Church must do it, not the government.

My own thoughts: If Modernism degenerated into Postmodernism, now that Wokeism is dying, where are we now in the West with the obvious paradigm shift and new sense of optimism? Do we move back up the descending chain to Modernism or do we make our awakening nations great again? What makes a nation great? Again, as Vishal says, “that which holds to God’s justice and law.”   





Thursday, February 13, 2025

FACING FACTS

 

FACING FACTS 

“I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.” (Gal. 2:20)

Introduction

Image from Web
We live in an age where the tendency is for people to act according to feelings and not facts. The Bible has always taught that facts are more important than feelings. This is not to say that there is no place for feelings in the Church. But rather that the facts of Scripture must be our guide no matter what your feelings are. I want us to consider a couple of things that will help us in our Christian life.

We are looking mainly at Galatians 2:20, but I just want you to note that from verses 18-21, Paul uses the first-person singular at least fourteen times. In this portion of Scripture, if you listed the personal pronoun in order, you would hear Paul say, “I, I, I, myself, I, I, I, I, me, I, I, me, me, I. So, we see, then, that there is a lot of personal application of the facts going on here.

As we look at what’s going on in this portion of Scripture don’t be afraid to apply these facts to yourself – if they fit.

You Are in Christ

Paul makes an earth-shattering statement in verse 20, “I have been crucified with Christ.” “I, Paul, have been put to death along with Christ!” What does he mean? Well, he means he died, not literally, but to his former ways, his former way of life. He could write a book and call it The Death of a Pharisee. His whole way of life died when Christ died on the cross.

So how can this be? Well, he has seen how Christ on the cross represents him. You’ve seen Muslims and Marxists and what not on television burn effigies of various people. Those effigies represent real people. Well, Paul is saying that Christ on the cross represents him as a real person, as a sinner. How can he say that? Well, it was revealed to him in the Gospel.

Paul tells us elsewhere that all men are sinners in Adam, (see e.g., Rom. 5:12; 1 Cor. 15:21, 22; 1 Cor. 15:45-49). If you were to turn to the 1 Corinthians 15:22 passage you’d see Paul says, “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive.” He’s saying that all those who are in Adam die but all those who are in Christ shall be made alive. In other words, Adam represents all people who die, but Christ represents all people who will be made alive. So, when Paul says, “I have been crucified in Christ”, he’s saying he has switched representatives. He’s saying that Adam is no longer his representative. Christ now is.

To be represented by Adam is to be under the condemnation of the law. But to be represented by Christ is to be free from that condemnation. “There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus...” (Rom. 8:1). The condemnation came to Adam and those he represented (which is all mankind) when he broke God’s law by eating the forbidden fruit.

In order to deepen our understanding of what Christ was doing on the cross, we need to understand God’s covenant with Adam before the Fall. Adam was the representative of all mankind in this covenant. The Westminster Confession of Faith calls that covenant The Covenant of Works.

Anyway, God created Adam perfect and upright, wrote his law on his heart and gave him the outward command to go forth multiply, subdue the earth, have dominion etc. (Gen. 1:26-28). We call this The Cultural Mandate, and we are reminded that it has not been revoked by God (see e.g., Gen. 9:1-7; Matt. 28:18-20). As a test, God also gave Adam the outward command not to eat the fruit of a certain tree upon pain of death (Gen. 2:16-17). Adam, then, in the Garden, was on probation. He had loseable everlasting life. Loseable everlasting life before the fall and, (upon redemption), unloseable everlasting life after the fall. Or, if you will, he was an Arminian before the Fall but a Calvinist after it!

So then, our main concern here is to understand that all those who are in Adam are under the Covenant of Works and are condemned by it. Therefore, all those who are not in Christ are under the Covenant of Works in Adam. The conditions of that covenant still remain the same today. They have never been revoked. The conditions are perfect obedience to God’s law – just as it was for Adam before the Fall.

So, what was Paul doing before he met Christ? He was trying to keep the Covenant of Works, which is seen in his erroneous view that a fallen human being can keep God’s law perfectly. And he thought he was doing a fine job of it too. Listen to what he said, “...circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee; concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning righteousness which is in the law, blameless. But what things were gain to me, these I have counted loss for Christ” (Phil. 3:5). But when Paul met Christ, he discovered that the Law of God had already killed him. It had killed him centuries before – way back in the Garden when Adam sinned. He had been seeking to uphold the terms of agreement in the Covenant of Works. But it was impossible for him to keep that covenant because he was a sinner before he even began. Why? Well, because Adam represented Paul in that covenant, Paul as a fallen human being has a share in Adam’s guilt and so do we.

Paul had been seeking to represent himself. However, as we all are, he was disqualified by God on account of his covenant representative, i.e., Adam. Therefore, in order for any of us to receive everlasting life, we need to find a new representative in the Covenant of Works. But all of mankind was condemned by Adam’s sin against God – all but One, “But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption as sons” (Gal. 4:4). The Son of God became the Son of Adam or the Son of Man (the same thing) when He was born of a woman. He became the Second Adam – born under the law. Why? To buy back those who were under, those who were condemned by the law as a Covenant of Works.

The law of God only condemns (Rom. 8:3). Saul the Pharisee, like all Pharisees, erroneously viewed the Mosaic law as a Covenant of Works, something that he had to keep to receive unloseable everlasting life, rather than that which shows us our great need to have faith in the Saviour promised by God (see e.g., Gen. 3:15, Isa. 7:14, 9:6-7). “Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith” (Gal. 3:24). The law was not given to anyone or any party, such as the Israelites at Mount Sinai, as a means of attaining salvation through keeping it. Fallen human beings are disqualified on account of original sin.

Adam failed as our representative to keep the Covenant of Works (Rom. 5:12). But the unfallen Christ, as our representative, kept the Covenant of Works perfectly by keeping every jot and tittle of God’s law (Matt. 5:17-19). Therefore, as our representative He has received everlasting life – for Himself and for those whose faith is in Him. He has received everything God the Father promised Him! He has received unloseable everlasting life for all those He represented, yes, for all those who receive the adoption as sons – even the Apostle Paul. If you are in Christ, then like Paul, you have been crucified in Christ. This means that you have been taken from under the condemnation of the Covenant of Works and placed under the acquittal of the Covenant of Grace. Whereas, the law declares the condemnation of all, the gospel declares salvation to all who believe (John 3:16).

You are no longer in Adam but in Christ the Second Adam, as Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:47 names Him. It means that you no longer seek to be justified by keeping the Law or the Covenant of Works. Christ has done this for you. Therefore, look to Him alone for your righteousness. Look outward to Christ and not inward to your own (supposed) works.

In summary: Adam broke the Covenant of Works for all mankind. Therefore, as sinners, no one can receive everlasting life through the keeping of the law. We are all condemned in Adam. However, Jesus Christ was without sin, and He kept the Covenant of Works perfectly. As our new representative He was obedient to the law even unto death. Therefore, when you look at Christ crucified you see that you were crucified with Him. How? Because you see in His death true righteousness revealed.

As surely as Samuel hacked Agag to pieces because Agag was a sinner (1 Sam. 15:32-33), so does the crucifixion of Christ hack us sinners to pieces. The penalty for breaking God’s Law, or if you will the Covenant of Works, hasn’t been softened. The wrath of God was poured out upon Christ who represented you the Covenant breaker. To be crucified with Christ, then, is to have received the full penalty of God’s law in Christ. Just as you had received Adam’s sin and guilt, so Christ has received your sin and guilt. But He has adopted you and you have received His righteousness. That what it means when you are in Christ... 

Christ in You

Paul goes on to say, “I have been crucified in Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me” (Gal. 2:20). What does he mean then by “Christ lives in me”? Well, we’ve already seen that Paul wasn’t actually crucified with Christ. It was his whole old way of thinking that was crucified. He used to think a man could justify himself before God by pointing to his own good deeds. But he became a new man when Christ with His good works was revealed to him.

Before Paul had met Christ, he had been trying to generate his own righteousness. He had been trying to keep the law, as a Covenant of Works, by his own steam. Then Christ revealed to Paul a righteousness that Paul hadn’t worked for. This righteousness is revealed in the Gospel as Paul says elsewhere to the Romans, “For in [the gospel] the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, ‘The just shall live by faith’” (Rom. 1:17).

Paul used to look inward all the time. He used to look inward all the time to see how he was going. When he was under the law, i.e., the Covenant of Works as he saw it, he was under tremendous pressure to perform. God was demanding the perfect keeping of all His commandments for justification. Not only was there the moral law, but there were all the dietary regulations. All the feasts had to be kept, all the ceremonial laws, all the judicial laws. Paul was trying to keep all of this to the letter, even to the jot and tittle. But he was trying to do so in his own strength. It was putting the cart before the horse. It was like Sisyphus pushing a huge boulder to the top of a hill only to have it roll back over him and kill him.

It’s right we examine ourselves to see if we are in the faith (1 Cor. 11:28). But the Christian looks at Christ when he examines himself (Heb. 12:2). Paul looked only at the Law, yes, as the Covenant of Works. There is no grace in the Covenant of Works after the Fall. It brings only condemnation, hardship and death. For this reason, the Lord revealed the Covenant of Grace to Adam after the Fall (Gen. 3:15). The protoevangelium, the promise of the gospel. The righteousness of Christ is revealed in the Covenant of Grace.

The Old Testament saints put their faith in the Christ to come. And we put our faith in the Christ who has come. Paul says in Romans 1:17 the same thing as Habakkuk 2:4. Therefore, the teaching of both Old and New Testament, the Bible, is that, “The just shall live by faith.” Faith in what? What is the object of the Christian’s faith? His own performance as he tries to do good works? Certainly not. “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life” (John 3:16).

All the Old Testament saints believed in Him and not in their own good works for everlasting life. There’s a whole bunch of Old Testament saints who believed in Christ listed in Hebrews 11, the “Hall of Faith.”

Now then, when you start talking about people believing in God’s only begotten Son, you are talking about faith. Look back in Galatians 2:20 and you will see where Paul’s faith was directed, “And the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.” Faith, then, has an object. And the object is the Son of God. To believe in the Son of God for salvation means that you don’t believe in yourself for salvation. And if you are believing in Jesus Christ, it means that you have faith in Jesus Christ the Son of God.

Before the Fall Adam was promised everlasting life for his obedience, i.e., God's law given as the Covenant of Works. (God's law had been witten on mankind's heart, Rom. 2:14-15). This was still an act of grace on God’s part. God didn’t have to promise Adam anything. But the Lord told Adam he would perish if he ate the forbidden fruit. Which means, conversely, that he would not perish but have everlasting life – so long as he abstained from eating the forbidden fruit. After the Fall the way of attaining everlasting life, what we now call salvation, was different. “Whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” But up until Paul met Him, he was believing in his own good works for everlasting life. I’ve been labouring the point on purpose. I want you to see that the Christian is no longer under the Covenant of Works. The Christian has been set free from the condemnation of that covenant. The Christian is now under the Covenant of Grace.

This is where the Christian needs to be very careful. This is where you hear people quote Romans 6:14b, “You are not under law but under grace.” This is taken by some to mean that, because we’re not under the Covenant of Works but under the Covenant of Grace, the Law has no claim on us. But Paul says that Christ is living in Him. So, we have to ask the question: What is Christ doing in Paul? What is Christ doing in you and me? Well, we have to agree that Christ is at WORK in each one of us. What’s He working towards? What does He want us to end up looking like? Well, He’s showing us that we were powerless to keep the Law of God in our sinful condition. He is showing us that He has kept the Covenant of Works perfectly, not for Himself but for us. He is revealing His righteousness to us, His perfect law-keeping as fully Man. And the more we see His righteousness, the more we see the lack of our own righteousness. And the more we see the lack of our own righteousness the more we seek His righteousness. In a word, this is called Sanctification.

Sanctification is something that takes place inside of you. Whereas Justification takes place outside of you. Sanctification is a progressive thing. That’s why we call we call it Progressive Sanctification. It is progressive in that as you trust in the Saviour and His righteousness more and more, you will trust in yourself and your own righteousness less and less. It’s not a “Let go and let God” exercise. It is an exercise in which both you and Christ who is in you are engaged.

Let’s see if we can begin to tie things together. When Paul said, “I have been crucified with Christ”, he is stating in no uncertain terms that he is dead to the law as a Covenant of Works. And that He is now alive to God. And he now has faith in the Son of God to keep that Covenant in every way on his behalf. Paul is declaring then that He is in Christ. Whatever Christ has done, He has done for Paul. Paul’s old way of life has been crucified along with Christ. Paul then has been justified by faith in Christ. But with justification comes sanctification.

Christ is at work in Paul helping him subdue any tendencies to go back to his former ways. Paul has been rebuking and correcting the Galatians for going back to their former ways. They are seeking to place themselves back under the Covenant of Works. They’re under the Covenant of Grace, but they’re beginning to act as if they’re under the Covenant of Works again.

The law given to Moses as handed down by God on Mount Sinai was never given as a means of fallen human beings gaining salvation by keeping it. That was the misunderstanding and the complete distortion of God’s law by the Pharisees and now the Judaizers at Galatia. God’s law, in all its aspects, moral, civil, and ceremonial, was given to show us up as sinners in need of a Saviour, i.e., Jesus Christ, and not as a way for us to save ourselves.

Image from Web
There is some confusion among some as to whether the law Moses received from God on Mount Sinai was given as a Covenant of Works. It certainly has clear echoes of the Covenant of Works. However, Westminster Confession of Faith 7:2-3, 5 states, “The first covenant made with man was a covenant of works, whereby life was promised to Adam, and in him to his posterity, upon condition of perfect and personal obedience. Man by his fall having made himself incapable of life by that covenant, the Lord was pleased to make a second, commonly called the Covenant of Grace: whereby he freely offereth to sinners life and salvation by Jesus Christ, requiring of them faith in him, that they might be saved … This covenant of grace was differently administered in the time of the law, and in the time of the gospel…” We focus on the words, “Man by his fall having made himself incapable of life by that covenant,” i.e., the Covenant of Works. Therefore, since the fall, due to incapability, life and salvation has never been attainable for sinners by keeping the law. However, the Mosaic administration of the Covenant of Grace was given as a rule of righteousness, a way to live one’s life as it pointed to the Christ to come. The Westminster Confession of Faith goes on to say in chapter 19:1-3, “God gave Adam a law, as a covenant of works … This law, after his fall, continued to be a perfect rule of righteousness; and, as such, was delivered by God upon mount Sinai in ten commandments, and written on two tables … Besides this law, commonly called moral, God was pleased to give to the people of Israel, as a church under age, ceremonial laws containing several typical ordinances; partly of worship, prefiguring Christ, his graces, actions, sufferings, and benefits; and partly holding forth divers instructions of moral duties. All of which ceremonial laws are now abrogated under the New Testament.”Therefore, since the fall, sinners can never be saved by their own keeping God’s law as a covenant of works. The Mosaic law was never given as a covenant of works, which is another way of simply saying that sinners have always been saved by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone.    

How does all of this apply to us? Well, you are either under the Covenant of Works or the Covenant of Grace. One is about trying to save yourself by your own good works. And the other is about doing good works because you have been saved (Eph. 2:8-10). Neither the Covenant of Works nor the Covenant of Grace are about ignoring God’s Law.

The Judaizers are like those in our own day that, (sometimes unwittingly), hold to a view that it’s faith plus works for our salvation, i.e., what is called a “works righteousness”, or more technically, a semi-Pelagian or Arminian view of salvation. Whereas the Judaizers are saying that the Galatians needed to do something to gain salvation, Paul is saying that his days of doing works to earn salvation died with Christ. Works righteousness is simply shorthand for Covenant of Works righteousness, for which fallen humanity, i.e., sinners need not apply. Only Christ could qualify to do that job.   

Perhaps you’re one of those who, like the non-Christian, ignore God’s Moral Law. Some Christians seem to think that Christ cancelled the Law or Covenant of Works. But Christ only fulfilled the conditions of the Law. He didn’t cancel it (Matt. 5:17-18).

So maybe you’re one of those Christians who just does what he or she likes. Well, that would make you a lawbreaker, wouldn’t it? Then you would need to ask yourself: Why are you so comfortable with breaking God’s Law? How can you be comfortable with breaking God’s Law if the great keeper of God’s Law is in you – unless of course He’s not at work in you? And if that is the case you are condemned under the Covenant of Works. Or perhaps you’re one of those Christians who are overloaded scruples. Don’t do this! Don’t do that! – a stickler for all the little nit-picking things. “Absolutely no cigarettes, absolutely no alcohol whatsoever” – that type of thing. You are, of course, free to smoke and/drink if you wish. But some look for bits of sawdust in other people’s eyes. They follow man-made rules and regulations as if they were the Word of God. Well, these types of folks are acting as if they are under the Covenant of Works. They’re supposed to be acting in accordance with the Covenant of Grace.

Your way of life before conversion has been crucified with Christ. So why are you acting according to the former ways? Your former ways have been put to death with Christ. Therefore, face the facts and act as if this were true. Unless of course you are not in Christ. The church has always had problems with these same issues down through the centuries. 

Conclusion

If you are in Christ, you have been Justified. You are no longer under the Covenant of Works as a way of salvation. Therefore, you should stop acting as if you were.

If Christ is in you then you should be acting as one under the Covenant of Grace. You should be looking to Christ as the great Covenant keeper. And as you watch the One who kept the Covenant of Works perfectly, you should see more and more of your own imperfections. This should cause you to progressively, with the assistance of Christ in you, subdue even any notion to break God’s Law. It’s all about facing facts and then living in accordance with them.

The facts are that if you’ve been Justified you have been and are being Sanctified. And if you are being Sanctified you have been Justified. Therefore, you should be acting in accordance with this knowledge. Those are the facts, so how do you feel about that?