Saturday, March 22, 2025

SHEPHERDS FOR SALE - How Evangelical Leaders Traded the Truth for a Leftist Agenda (Review)

 

Shepherds for Sale is one of those timely books. It is a “watchman on the wall” warning, a wake-up call to sleepy Christians relaxing on comfortable pews. Alas! Your shepherd may be for rent. “The hireling flees because he is a hireling and does not care about the sheep” (John 10:13).

Sometimes a preacher becomes known more for what he does not say than what he does say. Perhaps, not wanting to be political, he does not (or only obliquely) address contemporary issues, such as the types of subjects deftly addressed by Basham in her excellent book, e.g., Climate Change, Illegal Immigration, Abortion, Critical Race Theory, the LGBTQ Movement etc. The Bible has lots to say about these and every other issue, which is not always positive to say the least.

The book’s essence perhaps may be summed up in the following: “Do today’s Marxist activists have any reason to say they hate above anyone else the church leaders most celebrated by our cultural elites? Or do they find these “shepherds” not only don’t hinder but help their cause? It is the practice of wolves to dismiss the concerns of those who see compromise and false teaching slipping into the Church, to accuse those sounding the alarm of making mountains out of molehills. Yet Scripture never encourages us to minimize or turn a blind eye to such matters.” p. 240.

Thank you Megan Basham for writing this book and alerting the Lord’s Church that there are indeed Shepherds for Sale, even many well-known ones.  

Monday, March 17, 2025

PATRICK & THE SNAKES

 Happy St Parick's Day!

The following is excerpted from my Stick in Time novel, from Appendix 3, where the narrator says,

Patrick & the Snakes.

I should mention that one of the effective devices used by the enemy in his covert actions is to help propagate the myth that he and his demons do not exist. Thus, like one of your modern stealth-bombers, he can do serious damage to an individual, community, or even a whole nation, without it being realised by the injured party or parties what is going on!

Ireland can be used as an example of this. It is a nation divided: Protestant and Catholic. To be sure Protestant England’s wishing to expand her borders to include a subjugated Ireland does not help the Irish one bit. However, the teachings of the Reformation entered every other country in Europe too. However, in Ireland Protestantism – those seeking to reform the Christian church – is seen by these same Protestants as a bringing of that special freedom from bondage that only comes with the Gospel. But, by the Catholics, this same Gospel is seen merely as a propaganda tool, a weapon, used by the invading forces! The enemy loves this! Divide and conquer a whole nation: Protestant and Catholic!

Image from Web
However, if both Protestants and Catholics could be brought to see the whole of Ireland and all her people the way Saint Patrick saw them, which was as a factional people in need of God and His healing love and forgiveness, then we shall dream of seeing that nation become one with itself once more.

To be sure, the people Patrick met in his day had their own versions of God and how He ought to be worshipped, long before Patrick arrived. Yes, it was paganism! Yes, it was false worship! Yes, before Patrick Ireland was captive to the Serpent and his brood of vipers. But Patrick with his staff in his hand traversed the whole green countryside – uniting Ireland, by driving out, as it were, the snakes.

Did Patrick do it by force? By shouting down those he opposed? By vitriolic diatribe? No! He opened the floodgates of the Sacred Record to let its life-giving waters flow into every nook and cranny of every village, town and city. He did not attempt to defend the Sacred Record’s doctrines. He simply lived them! He loved the nation, the whole nation!

Patrick came to Ireland in obedience to what the Prince of Peace says in the Sacred Record, ‘Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.’

Image from Web
To be sure Patrick cared for the individual, but in obedience to his Master it was the nation, the Irish nation, that was his strong focus. He did not favour one faction or clan over another. He did not say to himself, let’s see, which group is closest to the truth and I’ll throw my lot in with them. No! He healed the Serpent-wounded nation by pouring in the balm of the Gospel! He did not use the Gospel as a club, as a stick, the measure of orthodoxy! Rather he lived it! He breathed it! He taught it! He taught it to the nation. He baptised the nation. He united the nation as one – Christian!

Ireland needs her Patrick to reunite her. She needs his staff to comfort her, for in the right hands his staff is symbolic of the tree of life whose leaves are for the healing of the nations. It is the rod of God. It is the reminder of the One who has crushed the Serpent’s head. ‘And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse and a branch shall grow out of his roots.’ Patrick’s Staff is the Bachall Iosa.

To be sure the Serpent has been mortally wounded by the Master at the cross. The great dragon knows his days are few. That is why he seeks to wreak so much devastation. He is the Destroyer. He is Appolyon. He is Abaddon, the Angel of the Abyss!


Watch video of The Deer's Cry aka St Patrick's Brerastplate: 

https://youtu.be/GGHWiAGpIP0?si=ZMlm2sFR_mNxI1sY

https://youtu.be/GGHWiAGpIP0




Wednesday, March 12, 2025

MY CHRISTIAN TESTIMONY

I was educated in the Scottish Education system in the 60s and very early 70s. We only had a smattering of the Bible, and the occasional RE classes were boring and were sometimes mocked even by the RE instructor! The general belief was that we had evolved as per Darwinism.

I grew up in a Communist/Marxist home. My dad helped get me a job in a Glasgow shipyard where he worked. The Glasgow shipyards were a hotbed for Communism, commonly known as the “Red Clydeside.” The town where I lived even had streets named after Marxist/Communists, such as Engels!

For several years, I considered myself to be an Atheist. However, especially after marriage and children, during the 80s I moved to more of an Agnostic position. After reading Marx and Darwin et al, I found them never really satisfying my “How did we get here?” questions. The “Big Bang” never explains what exactly big-banged! Where did the exploding material come from? Nothing?

In the mid to late 80s I began wondering about the deeper things in life. I had a beautiful wife and three beautiful children, a house and a job. And I began wondering, “Is this all there is? You live and then you die? What’s it all about?” Darwin’s suggestion that it was “to propagate the species” didn’t seem like a satisfactory answer, (neither does Dawkins’s even less tangible “selfish gene” hypotheses).

I began reading about fossils. I read about Islam, the Jewish Kabbalah, Mormonism, Jehovah’s Witnesses, among other things. I studied some of the writings of the Scottish philosopher, David Hume. However, growing up in Scotland I had heard about a thing called Freemasonry. I joined the Masons while living in Winnipeg, Manitoba. I joined because I was searching for truth, the meaning of life. I had seen those weird televangelists on TV get into scandals, and didn’t trust Christianity.

I joined the Masonic Lodge because I thought maybe God was hiding in there somewhere. While people call Freemasonry a secret society, Freemasonry calls itself a society with secrets. I read a lot of dusty tomes in the Masonic libraries as I searched for God. I used to present papers I had written on what I had learned; some of which was very esoteric and occultist.

My Lodge honoured my hard work by presenting me with a Bible; which I read cover to cover. It was a King James’ Version Bible which I found extremely difficult to read with its archaisms. With Bible in one hand and dictionary in the other, I search to see if perhaps it had anything useful to say about God and how we and everything else got here. Prior to reading the Bible, my understanding had been. “In the beginning there was nothing. This nothing exploded and became everything!” I thought at least the Bible made more sense than this in its opening line, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Gen. 1:1). Then came the “If God created everything, then who created God?” question. The Bible answers this by teaching that God is eternal, without beginning or end, that he is not part of creation, but outside of it.

However, it was particularly one verse that struck me. John 14:6 stuck with me, like the needle sticking on and old vinyl record, where Jesus says, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man cometh unto the Father, but by Me.” I remember thinking, “Who does this Jesus think he is, God?! Get out of the way Jesus. I am looking for God.”

Sitting in my armchair in my Winnipeg basement with my Bible, I began having an existential crisis. I began philosophically wondering if I really existed. Maybe it was all a dream, an illusion. Maybe I was lying in some hospital bed in a coma, dreaming. I got myself into an awful state with it all. I even got to the stage where I was sobbing, crying out to God, “I want to know You God!” That verse, the second half of it, kept coming into my mind, “No man cometh unto the Father, but by Me.” My cries to God became feeble, very feeble. The words of Jesus kept coming, “No one cometh unto the Father, but by Me.” Then the lights came on. An epiphany! I then realised that Jesus, as the Bible says, is the Word who became flesh and dwelt among us. He is Emmanuel which means God with us. Jesus is God! I started clinging to him for dear life! I later found out that he is the one that is clinging to me and that no one can snatch me out of his hand.

That was near the end of 1988. In 1990, with Dorothy and our three young children, we migrated from Canada to Australia.

In Canada I had been wandering from church to church looking for a spiritual home. Finding a Bible believing church can be hazardous, as not all churches hold to the clear teaching of the Bible. After visiting a different church on each Sunday, on my third Sunday in Australia, I walked into the Reformed Church in Toowong, Brisbane, (part of the Christian Reformed Churches of Australia denomination. The church building is gone now.) I was handed a hymnbook. In the front of the hymnbook there was a copy of the Heidelberg Catechism, which is a beautiful summary of many of the basic teachings of the Bible. After the service I asked if I could take it home to study and bring it back next Sunday. Like a good Berean (Acts 17:10-11) I studied all the footnoted Bible prooftexts to see if what the Catechism was saying lined up with the Scriptures. After much searching, I thought, “If these people believe this, then I have found my home!”

I left Freemasonry when I left Canada for Australia. For me, Jesus has all the answers.

Monday, March 10, 2025

THE BOOK THAT MADE YOUR WORLD (Review)

Vishal Mangalwadi’s The Book That Made Your World: How the Bible Created the Soul of Western Civilization, is one of those must-read books.

It is well-written, educational and, more importantly, will have you wanting to pick up the Bible and read it.

Dr Mangalwadi, being from India, gives a helpful “outsider’s" take on Western Civilization, how non-Christian religions, e.g., Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, held back India. He interjects and illustrates each chapter with personal anecdotes as he interacts with disparate things such as Kurt Cobain’s suicidal Nihilism (1994) to the hope and freedom birthed by the 1776 American Declaration of Independence.

As an interesting slight aside, Dr Mangalwadi writes, “… [W]hat happens with America’s 1776 Declaration of Independence? The Founders said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain undeniable [sic.] rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Are these truths self-evident to the human mind? A postmodernist would be absolutely right in insisting that the Declaration of Independence was wrong. These “truths’ are not “self-evident.” Human equality is not “self-evident’ anywhere in the world – not even in America.” pgs. 390-1. First off, let me say that I agree with Vishal. And secondly, let me say that I also disagree. How so?

Notice the “we” in “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”  It does not say “everyone” or “the whole world holds these truths to be self-evident.” Though it is true that India with its “caste” system, widow burnings, and Islam, with obvious sinful subordinationism of women (burkas etc.) and non-Muslims, (we could list America’s plantation slavery and a whole lot more), the Bible is what teaches that all men are created equal. Thus, why the “we” in “We hold these truths to be self-evident.” The American Founding Fathers, (yes, for all their flaws!), were a people of the Book. In other words, it is the Christian view that “we” hold, in holding that it is self-evident that all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain “undeniable” as in “unalienable rights.” It’s the old Golden Rule as spelled out by Jesus, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Would you like to be murdered? No? Then don’t murder others. Stolen from? Then don’t steal from others. Lied to? Someone commit adultery with your spouse? Etc. etc. Why not? Because it is self-evident that all men are created equal. It's our fallenness, our sinful nature, that denies this self-evidence. So, Dr Mangalwadi is indeed correct to say that it is not self-evident – but only to anyone or any community or religion not built upon the teaching of Scripture – i.e., contra 1776 America. To drive home our point, let us use a famous quote from America’s second president, (the one who came after George Washington), John Adams, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” True, President Adams is speaking of the Constitution and not the Declaration. However, the point here is that he is putting the “we” in “We hold these truths to be self-evident.” We the people” as in we Americans, whose nation was built on The Book That Made Your World.

I heartily recommend Vishal Mangalwadi’s book. It is intellectually stimulating and thought-provoking. And, importantly, it is not a difficult read for the average person from Western Civilization.    

Friday, March 7, 2025

LOVE & MARRIAGE

Love and Marriage

Runaway wagon. Image from Web.
There’s an old Sinatra song that alleges that love and marriage go together like a horse and carriage, that you can’t have one without the other. Is this true? What is love? What is marriage? As does marriage, love has it source in our Creator. ‘God is love’ (1 John 4:16). The LORD God, as it were, walked Adam’s bride down the aisle, ‘Then the rib which the LORD God had taken from man He made into a woman, and He brought her to the man’ Gen. 2:22). Was it love at first sight for Adam? ‘And Adam said, “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.” Therefore, a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh’ (Gen. 2:23-24). This is what came to be known as ‘leave and cleave’, i.e., leave parents and cling to spouse. We speak of marriage as getting hitched, hitching up.

Sin is when our love for God runs cold. When Adam sinned, God unhitched His carriage, i.e., Adam and the rest of humanity. He divorced humanity because of our unfaithfulness. He hates divorce (Mal. 2:16) but permits it because of our sin (Matt. 19:8-9). Nowadays love is symbolised by the shape of a heart. But Calvin says, ‘The human heart is a perpetual idol factory.’ We commit adultery with our legion of manufactured idols, false gods (Exod. 20:3-5; Jer. 3:6-9; Ezek. 16:32; Hos. 2:2). We’ve seen it many times in the old westerns, an unhitched wagon hurtling towards a cliff’s edge. God, do something or we’re all going to die!

‘For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life’ (John 3:16). God shows His love to us and for us by sending us His Son as a husband who loves us that much that He is willing to lay down His life for us. In marriage, we are to reflect this sacrificial love, ‘Husbands love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave Himself for her … For we are members of His body, of His flesh and bones.’ (Eph. 5:25, 30). Those who believe are the new carriage that has been renewed by His love. Unbelievers are the wreckage at the bottom of the canyon. Food for the vultures and the cayotes. ‘Your carcasses shall be food for all the birds of the air and the beasts of the earth, and no one shall frighten them away’ (Deut. 28:26). God offers mankind life, yet the love of many has run so cold that they would rather choose death. For those who worship the LORD, ‘And they shall go forth and look upon the corpses of the men who have transgressed against Me. For their worm does not die, and their fire is not quenched. They shall be an abhorrence to all flesh’ (Isa. 66:24; cf. Mark 9:44-38).

Image from Web.
It’s at the mere suggestion of Hell that the idol factories start working overtime, ‘My god would never send anyone to Hell!’ ‘Your God is so cruel!’ ‘My god loves everyone regardless!’ And so, factory furnaces that produce their idols grow hotter and louder, thus drowning out God’s genuine offer of salvation in Christ. And so, the carriage continues over the cliff to its everlasting doom. Hell has no escape hatch. You’re in the fiery furnace without the Angel of the LORD to rescue you (Dan. 3:25, 28; cf. Psa. 34:7). 

Yes, it is Christ, the Messenger of the covenant (Mal, 3:1) who rescues His bride, the church. ‘“Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” Now Joshua … was standing before the Angel’ (Zech. 3:2b-3).

Love and marriage do go together like a horse and carriage. Show your love for God by making sure you’re in His Son’s carriage (2 Cor. 13:5).      

Monday, March 3, 2025

THE PROCLAMATION

 

THE PROCLAMATION

O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you that you should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed among you as crucified? This only I want to learn from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Are you so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh? Have you suffered so many things in vain—if indeed it was in vain? Therefore He who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you, does He do it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Galatians 3:1-5.

Image from Web

Introduction

Paul, as it were, was nailing his “proclamation” to telegraph poles, church doors, and billboards. He was yelling it from rooftops, street corners, even in town squares throughout the land: “I bring good news from God!” He’d been all through Galatia. The Galatians had heard all about it. They had read all about it. So Paul is amazed at the Galatians for acting as if they never really heard and believed the good news. After he calls the Galatians “foolish” and “bewitched” he sets out to remind them what they had heard and had believed in the first place.

First off, we need to look at the general gist of what he proclaimed (the headlines) and was still proclaiming, then we’ll look a bit closer at the solid substance of what he was proclaiming, (the hardlines).

The Headlines

Paul reminds the Galatians that, “Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed among you as crucified” (Gal. 3:1). We need to zoom in on that word “portrayed”. What does it mean to portray something? My English dictionary says, firstly that it means: To represent by a drawing or painting etc. Does this mean that Paul painted a picture of the crucified Christ and showed it to the Galatians? Well, we have no biblical record of Paul walking around with a painting of Christ in his pocket. Therefore, he means that he has proclaimed the crucified Christ among them.

My dictionary gives another meaning for the word portray: To represent, as in a play etc. Did Paul walk around with a team of actors acting out a drama of the crucifixion? Well, there’s no biblical record of that either. My dictionary also gives another meaning which is a lot closer to the meaning in the Greek. It says, To describe or depict in words. Now we’re getting somewhere. The New Testament Greek word here has a few subtle shades of meaning. However the present context considered, the word means, “To placard publicly, set forth in a public proclamation so that all may read.” So, what Paul is saying is that the crucified Christ has been “placarded” publicly before the eyes of the Galatians. Therefore, we’re not talking about a Paul walking around holding up a Roman Catholic crucifix.

But what about the elements of the Lord’s Supper? Perhaps this is what Paul means when he says, “Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed among you as crucified.” “Take, eat; this is My body which is broken for you; do this in remembrance of Me... This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.” You must admit the crucified Christ is portrayed in the Lord’s Supper. But this is the very compelling reason why Paul is not referring to the Lord’s Supper. Because the Lord’s Supper is an ongoing ordinance, “...as often as you drink it...” And the crucified Christ was portrayed before their eyes, not is portrayed. Anyway, in chapter 4 of Galatians Paul reminds them that he preached the gospel to them. Therefore, though the Lord’s Supper is a portrayal of the crucified Christ, Paul isn’t referring to the Sacrament here. Paul is talking about a public “proclamation” that took place among the Galatians as a people!

He was in the streets of Galatia like an old “town crier” who says, “Hear ye! Hear ye!” Then he pulls out a scroll and he proceeds to make the proclamation. Well, this is the essence of what Paul had done publicly in Galatia.

Paul refers to this previous encounter with Galatians in chapter 4:13, where he says, “You know that because of physical infirmity I preached the gospel to you at first.” Maybe his infirmity was an eye problem. Paul says they would have plucked out their own eyes and given them to him if they could (4:15). And then in 6:11 he makes reference to writing in big letters. Perhaps he mentions the word “eyes” in chapter 3:1 to jolt their memories of the time Paul proclaimed the gospel to them.

So then, Paul didn’t produce a painting of the crucified Christ. Neither did he perform a drama depicting the crucifixion, but rather he proclaimed a documented event of history.

So what was the general gist of Paul’s public proclamation? He says “we preach Christ crucified” (1 Cor. 1:23). And in 1 Corinthians 2:2 he says, “For I determined to not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified.” So Paul then, is consistent. He preached Christ and Him crucified among the Galatians too. But does that mean the sum total of his preaching was what people nowadays call the simple gospel? By this they have in mind the stuff of evangelistic rallies and altar calls, where you tell them about Christ dying on a cross. You do it in such a way that people can’t help but they feel sorry for Christ. Then you try to get them to make a “decision” to follow Jesus while they’re feeling emotional.

There are many Christians who claim you’re not preaching the gospel unless you’re talking specifically about the cross. Therefore, they expect the preacher to do backflips and somersaults and land at the foot of the cross in every sermon they preach, otherwise the preacher has not preached the gospel.

It’s one of the great tragedies in the Church today that men have reduced the gospel to a few points. Then they trot out these points to parade them before people’s eyes. They preach the same old sermon every time because they think of these points as the sum total of the gospel. Is this what Paul was doing on the highways and byways? Did Paul condense the message of the cross to a few eye-catching headlines? Did He go around the land just yelling out headlines?

Headlines are just summaries encapsulating the story. They are just attention grabbers. They’re not the whole story. If you’re interested, you’re supposed to buy the whole newspaper and “read all about it.” But there are people today arguing that the headlines of the gospel are the whole story. And they accuse people (such as myself) of adding to the gospel when we say the whole Bible is the gospel. Well, the whole Bible is the Gospel, because the whole Bible speaks of Jesus Christ. The Old Testament speaks of what He was coming to do. The New Testament speaks of what He has done. He was coming to keep the Law as a Covenant of Works. Read all about it in the Old Testament and in the New, yes, the whole Bible. He was coming to keep God’s Law perfectly on behalf of those condemned by the Law. Read all about it in the Old and New Testaments, the Bible.

Here’s the general gist of what Paul the Town Crier was yelling out: “Hear ye! Hear ye! God the maker and creator of heaven and earth has sent His only begotten Son into the world to save the world! His Son never stopped being the Son of God, but also became the Son of Man. He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit and was born of a virgin. He was crucified at the hands of wicked men. His dead body was placed among the dead, but on the third day He rose again. After He revealed Himself to many people He ascended into heaven. He is now seated at the right hand of the Father. But this Man Jesus Christ is coming to judge you, whether you’re alive or dead at the time. And He has sent His Spirit to testify to the truth of the One I proclaim. Therefore, repent and believe in the Gospel!”

These are just some of the headlines, all of which have to do with the Gospel message. And those of you who know your creeds will have detected some of the so called Apostles’ Creed in some of those headlines. But all the other headlines can be summarized in the one big headline: Christ and Him crucified. And Paul has already portrayed this before the eyes of the foolish Galatians. Who have been listening to and believing what the trashy tabloids are putting out, you know, the ones that embellish the truth and make up things? But Paul is proclaiming only what has been written and recorded in all of God’s Word.

The Hardlines

Are you familiar with that portion of Scripture in John’s Gospel where Jesus was telling people that they had to eat His flesh and drink His blood? (John 6). Well, a whole bunch of His disciples departed from Him about that point! John 6:60 says, “Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this, said, ‘This is a hard saying; who can understand it?’” When they got down to brass tacks, when they got beyond the headlines, they didn’t like what Christ was saying. These hard sayings we are calling hard lines. Hard lines are the solid substance of the message.

Headlines are milk for babies. Hard lines are the meat. Paul said to the Corinthians, “I fed you with milk and not with solid food; for until now you were not able to receive it...” (1 Cor. 3:2). The Apostle Peter wrote, “As newborn babes, desire the pure milk of the word, that you may grow thereby” (1 Pet. 2:2). The idea is that people begin with just the headlines and then they progress onto the hard lines.

I almost compulsively bought a newspaper because I was intrigued by a headline. But I changed my mind. Why buy a paper for only one little article? I can’t be bothered with the sports section; the jobs section; the new homes section. I’m mainly interested mainly in the Editorial section. But this is exactly the way people treat the Bible. And I put it to you that they do this precisely because of their view of the gospel.

“What do Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy have to do with the Gospel?” is what they ask. “What does any of the Old Testament have to do with the Gospel? Nothing!” is what they say. “The Old Testament is the Law and what does the Law have to do with the Gospel?” is what they say.

The Galatians were in the process of departing from Christ, so what does Paul do? He writes them an Epistle explaining the purpose of the Law. But what does the Law have to do with the Gospel? It has everything to do with the Gospel. Why? Because we are saved by works of the Law! That’s why. But not by our own works, not by our owns works of the Law. But we are saved by Christ’s works of the Law.

Christ kept the Law as a Covenant of Works perfectly unto death, even death on a cross. Therefore, you cannot present Christ and Him crucified unless you explain why He was crucified. He was crucified because He was fulfilling the Law. Read all about in the Old Testament in the New Testament, i.e., the whole Bible.

Matthew 5:17-18 should suffice for now: Jesus said, “Do not think I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.” Therefore, you cannot possibly know what Jesus did if you have no idea what the Law is. And you’ll never have any idea if you keep on thinking the Law has got nothing to do with the gospel.

Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones put it this way, “A person who does not know his Old Testament is – forgive the expression – just a fool. You need your Old Testament; you cannot understand the New without it.” This is exactly what Paul is saying to the foolish Galatians. He’s preaching them the Gospel from the Old Testament. If you read ahead you’d see that he quotes from a few places in Genesis, from Exodus, Leviticus, places in Deuteronomy, Isaiah, Habakkuk, Malachi. He’s all over the Old Testament as he proclaims the crucified Christ to them.

Speaking of the Gospel Paul says to the Romans, “For in it [the gospel] is the righteousness of God is revealed” (Rom. 1:17). The righteousness of God is revealed in Jesus Christ. How is it revealed in Jesus Christ? It’s revealed by looking at what Christ did on the cross. Listen to how Jay Adams put it, “The cross was not merely an act of compassion and mercy directed toward mankind; it was a cosmic event in which God demonstrated who and what He is before all the universe.”

Are you getting the picture? Is it sinking in? THE CROSS IS A DEMONSTRATION OF WHO GOD IS! Who or what is this God who made the heaven and the earth and dwells in unapproachable light? Well, there’s the headline: “Man Dies On Cross!” But you have to own a Bible before you can read all about it.

Now, I’m sure we’ve all heard about Christians in foreign lands, where all they had was one page of the New Testament and this kind of thing? Or the story of the man who went into the Christian bookshop asking if Mark had written any other books because he enjoyed it so much. Well, it’s one of those vexing questions: How much of the Gospel does a man need to understand before he’s saved? Well, I want to put it to you that it’s not how much you understand, but rather how much can you reject and be saved.

You’ve probably heard that Martin Luther called the Epistle of James an epistle of straw! I’d like to defend his honour by saying that Luther did not reject James. He just, at the time, found what James seemed to him to be teaching, hard to swallow. Luther had gone from the headlines of the Gospel to the hard lines of James’ Epistle! Luther, it would seem, was struggling with something of what the Galatians were struggling. What is the proper use of the Law for the Christian? The Law is no longer a Covenant of Works to us who are saved by grace. So what is it then? Well, I’ll tell you again: - the Law is the revelation of who God is.

And if you want to see the revelation of who God is then look to the cross. For that is where the Law of God points you. But you won’t fully understand the cross without understanding the Law as a Covenant of Works. But neither will you fully understand the Law if it is devoid of the cross. That’s why there is Gospel in the Old Testament and Law in the New Testament. They go hand in hand. Remove the Law from the Gospel and you have Antinomianism. Remove the Gospel from the Law and you have Legalism. Therefore, read all about the cross in the whole Bible, Old and New Testaments.

What does Paul say to the Corinthians in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4? “Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you – unless you believed in vain. For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures...”

Whatever Jesus Christ did then, He did in accordance to the Scriptures. In fact, Jesus said, “You search the Scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life; and these are they which testify of Me” (John 5:39). What Scriptures were Jesus talking about? He was talking to Pharisees. Therefore, Jesus was saying the Old Testament testified of Him. Something that testifies is a testament, isn’t it? No one would argue against the fact that the New Testament testifies of Jesus. Therefore, if Jesus Christ says the Old Testament is testifying of Him, then the Old Testament must be included as the gospel. And the Apostle Paul was using the OT as such. Edmund P Clowney says it like this: “If we are going to carry Bibles and not simply pocket Testaments, we should surely be using the Old Testament more than we do. The missionary Bible of the apostolic church was the Old Testament Scripture. Our Lord in the synagogue in Nazareth (Luke 4), Peter at Pentecost (Acts 2), Paul in the synagogues of Asia Minor and Greece – these all preached the gospel from the Old Testament. During the time which the apostolic witness to Christ was still being recorded, the Old Testament was the Scripture from which the church preached Christ.”

Image from Web
Paul like any normal Christian going to tell people about Christ would surely take a Bible with him. The Old Testament had been translated into Greek, and some of the New Testament may have been available to him. Paul says to Timothy, “Bring the cloak that I left with Carpus at Troas when you come – and the books, especially the parchments.” Listen to an excerpt of what he proclaimed when he went to Athens: “Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent, because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained. He has given assurance of this to all by raising Him from the dead” (Acts 17:30-31).

Conclusion

When it comes to proclaiming the Gospel it’s good to draw people’s attention to the headlines. But keep in mind that headlines are just that, headlines. Therefore, don’t forget to show people the hardlines too.

Have you been guilty of ignoring those parts of the Bible you deem as unimportant? Have you been neglecting books of the Old Testament? Perhaps you’ve been neglecting to read the whole of the Old Testament? If this is the case with you, isn’t it a bit like you’ve living on a diet of headlines? How do you expect to grow as a Christian? How deep is your understanding of Christ and Him crucified? You need to read the hardlines as well as the headlines in order to grow in Christ.

I would encourage you, whatever you thought the gospel was in the past, treat the whole Bible as the Gospel, for that’s what it is. For the whole Bible is the revelation of what God was going to do and has done in Christ. This is what Paul meant when he said he’s clearly portrayed the crucified Christ before the eyes of the Galatians.

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

WHY I'M NOT AN ATHEIST

 Preface

My father and mother were Marxists like their parents before them. The area where I grew up (Alexandria, Dunbartonshire) even had streets named after Marxists (such as Engels Street, named after Frederick Engels, who with Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto). I started my working life in the early 70s in a shipyard on the “Red Clydeside” (i.e., “red” as in a Socialist/Communist area of) Glasgow.

It was during my study of the teachings of Marx that I discovered that he had no answer to the question regarding the origin of humanity. It seemed to me that if he was successfully to influence (manipulate?) the minds of men and women to his way of thinking (i.e., to think his thoughts after him) then he needed to base his model of social engineering on something more solid than the vague musings of Charles Darwin. Marxist Socialism is Social Darwinism. You cannot have one without the other. The World Socialist Website writes,


The two great historical theories of the 19th century, of Darwin and Marx … have fundamentally changed our understanding of the world. They were part of the development of science in its broadest form – the desire to comprehend the natural and social worlds in order to change them for the benefit of mankind.[1]

If Darwin got it wrong then that which is based upon Darwinism must be wrong. From the tearing down of the Berlin Wall to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Socialism has been proven to be wrong. Examples of this truth could be multiplied. Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, and China garner no envy from those who love the freedoms we (used to) enjoy in the various Western democracies. Hitler’s form of government, like today’s China, was National Socialism. However, we are now not permitted by the Politically Correct Movement to connect Hitler with Socialism!!!, (nor the Ku Klux Klan for that matter). Hitler and KKK are portrayed as right-wing by the Social-Engineers of the “Department of Revisionist History”. Join in the fun and do a scientific social experiment: Ask your friends if Hitler (and the Ku Klux Klan) were Leftist.

It matters not to me whether Hitler or Ku Klux Klan members[2] or any other Socialists are called “far right” (Wikipedia) or even “far left”. What worries me is that these were violent Progressives. Socialism gave birth to Progressivism in which the umbilical cord is still very much attached!

In the West we have reached a point in history where our freedoms as law-abiding individuals are shrinking at an alarming rate as governments apply the Socialist theory of Political Correctness to attain their utopian classless society. Freedom of Speech is curtailed. Sodomy and buggery are accommodated, endorsed and even promoted by the State redefining marriage. This is Socialism socially engineering mankind in its own image and likeness. Progressives, whether Left or Right, remain Socialistic regardless of their political parties by virtue of their desire to have government redistribute the wealth of the individual in order to attain their vision for society. Adolf Hitler was as much a Socialist as was Stalin. In Socialism all must agree with the collective vision or be ostracised, demonised, imprisoned and… (take, for example, the carnage of the French Revolution). This is not God’s way, which is, in my humble opinion, a far better way.

It became clear to me through my studies of Marx and Marxism that he did not believe in the God of Scripture. Otherwise he would not have come up with his social theories. Marx was a Materialist like Hegel before him. Dialectical Materialism. Thus, I put down my copy of “The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists” (Robert Tressell) and picked up a copy of the Bible, the true inspiration for any philanthropic endeavour. Therein I discovered a better way, a better way to love my neighbour as myself.

What Socialism pretends to be, Biblical Christianity really is! Biblical Christianity is the reality of a caring society, a society in which justice is blind. First off, Christianity answers the question of origins, i.e., the: Who we are as individuals and What we are supposed to be as a society. And secondly, unlike Socialism which has been proven to fail over and over, Biblical Christianity really works when put into practice, e.g., democratic government, the rule of law, justice for all, individual rights (in line with the rule of law), Capitalism, schools, hospitals, public sanitation, the abolition of slavery, etc., etc., etc. One only has to study what John Calvin did for Geneva with Biblical Christianity to see how the teachings of the Bible apply to society.

In the (Biblical) Westminster system of government and public meetings there are those who speak for a motion (i.e., an issue) and those who speak against it. A moderator (or referee) ensures that the issue is sufficiently discussed before it is put to a vote. This is democracy! However, Socialism seeks to silence all dissenters from its collective Socialist thought. Thus, today’s Political Correctness Movement. In this the very foundations of the West presently are being destroyed by Socialism in its various forms. Socialism is Atheistic. Because it is rooted in the Atheism of Marx et al, Socialism is a blight on the fruit of Western freedom.


It is when a people forget God, that tyrants forge their chains.[3]

That “The pen is mightier than the sword” may be true, but some would use that mighty instrument to write vitriolic ad-hominem arguments instead of speaking directly to the issue at hand. I have no personal axe-to-grind with anyone. I desire only to state my own personal hang-ups with Atheism as a contemporary movement. Readers are free to agree/disagree with my take on it. However, please allow me freedom of thought and the freedom to express that thought in written form.

There is life after Marx. I am not an Atheist because of the grace of God. My father and mother also became Christians after Marx. Yes, it is hard to be a consistently Biblical Christian, especially for those having been previously heavily influenced by Socialism, and with so much of it permeating the society in which we currently live. Therefore, as Christians we need to keep on “looking unto Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith” Hebrews 12:2a.

It is with the following gracious teaching of Jesus in mind that I have written my little book called, “Why I am Not an Atheist”. Note the profound depth of grace contained in what Jesus says,


When His disciples James and John saw [that people were not receiving and believing in Jesus] they said, ‘Lord, do You want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them, just as Elijah did?’ But He turned and rebuked them, and said, ‘You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men’s lives but to save them.’ And they went to another village.[4]

May my manner herein and hereafter be of the Spirit of Christ! 



[2] To be sure, a Democrat does not necessarily a (full blown) Socialist make. However, the point is that Democrats are Progressives, which, whether Left or the Right, is Socialistic. It is Socialism by another name.

“Most prominent in counties where the races were relatively balanced, the KKK engaged in terrorist raids against African Americans and white Republicans at night, employing intimidation, destruction of property, assault, and murder to achieve its aims and influence upcoming elections. In a few Southern states, Republicans organized militia units to break up the Klan.” - http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/kkk-founded

[3] Patrick Henry

[4] Luke 9:54-56, New King James Version.